msb@lsuc.UUCP (Mark Brader) (03/11/86)
When the regular news statistics show that seismo has processed 77 articles in 2 weeks, and I get mail from ARPA a month late, it begins to seem likely that there's trouble at seismo. Is there? Mark Brader
woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) (03/12/86)
> When the regular news statistics show that seismo has processed > 77 articles in 2 weeks, and I get mail from ARPA a month late, > it begins to seem likely that there's trouble at seismo. Is there? Not on the USENET side, anyway. They are our main news feed, and we are still getting through to them. Of course, they have totally failed to call us in the last few days and usually there's at least a few token calls from them to exchange mail messages (we pay for most of our own news). What's up, Rick? --Greg -- {ucbvax!hplabs | decvax!noao | mcvax!seismo | ihnp4!seismo} !hao!woods CSNET: woods@ncar.csnet ARPA: woods%ncar@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA "If the game is lost, we're all the same; no one left to place or take the blame; Will we leave this place an empty stone, or a shining ball of earth, we can call our home"