CSvax:Pucc-H:Physics:hal@pur-ee.UUCP (09/30/83)
The type BITSET has no business being a STANDARD type, it belongs in SYSTEM. Its definition is blatantly machine dependent. A related problem with all languages that have a SET type: Why should there be a limit on the size of a SET? Certainly a set which fits in one word is more efficient to access than one which requires many words; but so what? Can you imagine a language which limited the size of an ARRAY or a RECORD to "a constant defined by the implementation"? If there has to be a "small" limit (instead of MaxInt or MaxCard being the limit), then as the very MINIMUM it should be possible to say SET OF CHAR; Hal Chambers Physics Dept. Purdue Univ. (...!pur-ee!pur-phy!hal)