[net.lang] Will Fortran ever die out? Some comments from SIGPLAN Notices

donn@utah-cs.UUCP (Donn Seeley) (08/24/84)

Here are some excerpts from the panel discussion on 'Programming
Language Issues for the 1980's' at SIGPLAN '83, a transcript of which
appeared in the August SIGPLAN Notices...  [p. 57, v. 19, #8]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Larry] Rowe:  Most programs are written in COBOL and FORTRAN.  Is
there any hope that the good ideas discussed at this conference will
impact these languages?

[Stu] Feldman:  No.  FORTRAN is certainly on its way to surpass Ada in
overall bulk.  COBOL is moving at best sluggishly in any direction.
It's probably in better shape, therefore.  It is too late for this
conference to affect either of those languages.  The programming
language conferences of the mid-70's did FORTRAN in.

Rowe:  Is there any language that will replace FORTRAN?

Feldman:  Fortran-8X.  I believe the Fortran-8X effort will cap Fortran
progress.  It's my personal view that it will make the language
sufficiently undesirable that by the late 80's, its [use] will fall off
badly.  That's my personal guess.

[Peter] Deutsch:  I'm not so sure about that.  I don't think Common
Lisp is going to replace Lisp.  Interlisp didn't eliminate Lisp.

[Butler] Lampson:  You perhaps may not realize just how awful
Fortran-8X is.

Deutsch:  Ah, this is true.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comment,

Donn Seeley    University of Utah CS Dept    donn@utah-cs.arpa
40 46' 6"N 111 50' 34"W    (801) 581-5668    decvax!utah-cs!donn

jeff@gatech.UUCP (08/27/84)

I don't remember the exact quote but the idea is here.

One individual to another, "What language do you think will be most
prominent by the year 2000".

Other individual, "I don't know but its name will be FORTRAN".
-- 
Jeff Lee
CSNet:	Jeff @ GATech		ARPA:	Jeff.GATech @ CSNet-Relay
uucp:	...!{akgua,allegra,rlgvax,sb1,unmvax,ulysses,ut-sally}!gatech!jeff