jans@mako.UUCP (Jan Steinman) (02/10/85)
In article <8500004@ccvaxa.UUCP> preece@ccvaxa.UUCP writes, quotes: >>Since it is me who is being castized here I figured I ought to respond. > >I suppose it was probably just a typo, but "castize" is a pretty nifty new >word, if it was intended. A useful combination of "chastise" and >"castigate", which have somewhat different connotations. > Gee, for some reason, I thought the combination was "chastize" with "castrate". ;-} -- :::::: Jan Steinman Box 1000, MS 61-161 (w)503/685-2843 :::::: :::::: tektronix!tekecs!jans Wilsonville, OR 97070 (h)503/657-7703 ::::::
dgary@ecsvax.UUCP (D Gary Grady) (02/11/85)
> I suppose it was probably just a typo, but "castize" is a pretty nifty > new word, if it was intended. A useful combination of "chastise" > and "castigate", which have somewhat different connotations. Oh. I thought it was a sort of unpleasant surgery. -- D Gary Grady Duke U Comp Center, Durham, NC 27706 (919) 684-3695 USENET: {seismo,decvax,ihnp4,akgua,etc.}!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary
preece@ccvaxa.UUCP (02/14/85)
> Since it is me who is being castized here I figured I ought to respond.
----------
I suppose it was probably just a typo, but "castize" is a pretty nifty
new word, if it was intended. A useful combination of "chastise"
and "castigate", which have somewhat different connotations.
scott preece
gould/csd - urbana
ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece