[net.lang] Net.Compiler

armstron@sjuvax.UUCP (L. Armstrong) (10/28/85)

***  ***

I think that net.compiler is a great idea.  Charles Wingate argues that most
compiler discussions are found in net.lang and should be left there.  However,
this is not true.  Many good compiler discussions are also found in net.arch,
and are not always ported to net.lang as well. I think that having one seperate
group for compilers is a great idea.

-- 

NAME		Len Armstrong
UUCP		{astrovax | bpa | burdvax | allegra }!sjuvax!armstron
ORGANIZATIONS	RCA Advanced Technology Labs
		St. Joseph's University
PHONES		(WORK) (609) 866-6647

mason@utcsri.UUCP (Dave Mason) (11/04/85)

Though I doubt the powers that be will buy it, or net.os, and I'm just
about argued out.

-- 
Usenet:	{dalcs dciem garfield musocs qucis sask titan trigraph ubc-vision
 	 utzoo watmath allegra cornell decvax decwrl ihnp4 uw-beaver}
	!utcsri!mason		Dave Mason, U. Toronto CSRI/ Ryerson Polytech
CSNET:	mason@Toronto
ARPA:	mason%Toronto@CSNet-Relay
BITNET:	FCTY7053@RYERSON.BITNET