[net.invest] Weekly Business Summary - January 28, 1983

9311djl (01/30/83)

               W E E K L Y    B U S I N E S S    S U M M A R Y

       ******************************************************************
       Vol. I  No. 15              January 28, 1983
       ******************************************************************

       HEADLINES

          o+ The Department of Commerce reported today that its index of
            leading economic indicators rose by a substantial 1.5% in
            December 1982.  The rise was the biggest increase in the economic
            barometer in two years, and the positive news signals an imminent
            economic recovery.  The question remains on how strong the
            recovery will be.  Having increased moderately for the past eight
            out of nine months, the index is certainly pointing to at least
            modest real economic growth for 1983.

          o+ Domestic auto sales improved by 11.5% in mid-January 1983 as
            compared to the same period in 1982.  The improvement was the
            ninth straight 10-day period year-over-year increase since late
            October 1982.  The reason for the upbeat sales continues to be
            the sales incentives such as lower financing rates offered by the
            automakers.

          o+ Initial claims for jobless benefits dropped significantly in
            mid-January mounting hopes that unemployment rises may be
            staggering.  For the first time since September of 1981, claims
            for unemployment insurance benefits fell below the half million
            mark leading many economists to believe that the unemployment
            rate may be falling but only slowly.  Furthermore, the Help-
            Wanted Advertising index rose to 83 from 78 in December the first
            rise in nearly eight months.  The Weekly Business Summary
            estimates that the jobless rate for January will remain nearly
            unchanged at a rate of 10.8%.

          o+ Wall Street investors will be watching for the outcome of this
            Sunday's Super Bowl.  Is this because many investors have taken
            up gambling in their free time?  No.  They are watching because
            it seems that the winning team portends the successfulness of the
            stock market for the coming year.  For every Super Bowl except
            one, if the winning team is an NFC team or a team that was in the
            old NFL and was transferred to the AFC (e.g. Pittsburgh or
            Baltimore), then the stock market indicators like the Dow Jones
            Industrial average or Standard and Poor's 500 Index increases for
            the year.  If an AFC team (a non-old-NFL team) wins, then the
            stock market falls.  Only the 1970 Super Bowl did not correctly
            forecast the stock market's fate.  Anybody picking the Redskins?

          o+ The Reagan Administration submitted a $848.5 billion federal
            budget to Congress for fiscal 1984.  The federal deficit will be
            nearly $190 billion as estimated by Administration economists.
            The deficit for 1983 was revised to be around $210 billion.

          o+ Currently, the federal budget deficit for the first three months
            of fiscal 1983 is at $68.3 billion up from $48.2 billion for the
            same period in fiscal 1982.


       Length of Post War Recessions

       The 1981-82 recession has lasted 18 months if you agree that the
       recession actually began in July 1981 and ended in December 1982.  How
       does that compare to the length of previous recessions?  It's the
       longest.  Here are results from previous downturns:


             1981-82:  18 months
             1973-75:  16   "
             1969-70:  11   "
             1960-61:  10   "
             1953-54:  10   "
             1957-58:   7   "
             1980:      5   "

       Why are there so many recessions since the late sixties?  One reason
       is that our economy lacks deep-rooted strength.  It has been
       artificially stepped up by the overspending of the federal government.
       For long term economic growth, there must be less government
       intervention.