[net.invest] Orphaned Response

johnl@haddock.UUCP (03/15/84)

#R:decwrl:-579800:haddock:11900002:177600:454
haddock!johnl    Feb 29 11:30:00 1984

If you rent out your house, that's income, and the mortgage interest
can be applied against it.  For that matter, if you really don't live
in the house, you can treat it as an investment property and deduct
repairs, heat, etc.

But if you're moving overseas, it probably pays to talk to somebody who
knows about foreign tax rules.  The rules are strange, and the way that
the IRS and tax court interprets them are stranger still.

John Levine, ima!johnl

johnl@haddock.UUCP (03/15/84)

#R:eisx:-69500:haddock:11900003:177600:2316
haddock!johnl    Mar  4 18:45:00 1984

If your prime goal in managing your IRA is safety, then indeed a sensible
strategy is to diversify, although it seems to me that putting the money
in a bank IRA account which is insured by the government and pays in the
vicinity of 10% is even safer.

On the other hand, if you're in your 20s or 30s, you aren't going to be
taking any money out of your IRA for 30 or 40 years, and you'll probably
be making a lot more in the future than you are now.  This means that
safety may well not be your primary goal at this point.  You might
consider wild speculation.  Historically, the overall return from risky
investments is much better than from conservative ones, although the
variation is a lot more.  (This is why U.S. government bonds pay
relatively low interest - there are few surprises.)  So if you take a
bunch of flyers now, a few of them might hit, and the odds are that
you'll make more than if you stuck with a bank, mutual fund, or other
conservative investment.  You can always switch to more conservative
investments later if you get nervous, and when you're older and richer,
you'll likely be able to save more if you still need to.

Moreover, most of you reading this have an advantage over the general
public in that you know a lot about computers and can make better
assessments than most people about computer stocks, at least.  [For
example, it's pretty clear to me that companies making IBM PC knockoffs
are in trouble, since IBM has shown that they want the whole market; e.g.
the new portable PC does roughly the same as a Compaq and costs slightly
less.  Compaq is OK for now, since they have a portable XT and IBM
doesn't, but the handwriting's on the wall.  Same for Eagle, Corona, etc.
Better to find somebody with products that go into some niche IBM
doesn't or else complement IBM stuff like Lotus does.  End of
digression.]

Now, if you're the kind of person who gets nervous every time your NYNEX
stock dips a quarter of a point, or if you find financial reports
baffling, the risky strategy isn't for you.  But if you don't need the
money right away (clearly, or you wouldn't put it in an IRA), are willing
to take the risk of losing it, and have some interest in researching
stocks and stuff, it's worth a thought.

John Levine, ima!johnl

PS:  I have this great oil drilling deal ...

tbul@trsvax.UUCP (08/16/84)

#R:decwrl:-286000:trsvax:52900009:37777777600:1159
trsvax!tbul    Aug 16 12:11:00 1984

If you read back through the last several weeks of Wall Street Journal, you
will find many (3 - 5) articles (one about 3 days ago or so) on Trilogy.
The bottom line of these articles seems to be that their superchip technology
thrust has failed...well, perfecting the technology is not viable at this time.
Every one that has loaned T. any amount of money is writing the loans off.
This is one of the reasons that the stock has dropped.

The future seems to be that T is going to use what knowledge it has gained and
sell that.  As for the price of T and is it a good buy is very questionable.  I
would consider many items including exactly what they plan to do in the future
to make money.  From what I remember, they have had 4 years to make it a go
but perhaps it is time the share holders got up and went...

I think I would wait for them to come out with a viable product or service,
one that sells well, and watch for earnings growth.

				Tom Bulkowski


"Find an aim in life before you run out of ammunition." - Arnold Glasow

allegra!convex!ctvax!trsvax!tbul  Fort Worth, Texas

	O O O   Official Software Engineer of the 1984 Olympics
         O O

bruce@ISM780.UUCP (02/06/85)

"The Stock Options Manual"
Gastineau, Gary L
McGraw-Hill Book Company
ISBN 0-07-022970-8

rjn@hpfcmp.UUCP (rjn) (06/30/85)

re: latic culture scam

CNN did a half-hour segment on one of these flimflam  outfits.  They concluded
it was not a "pyramid"  scheme  (endless  hierarchy  of  "distributors"),  but
rather a "Ponzi" scheme.  The money paid out to early investors ("growers") is
all coming  from later  investors - and not from  resale of the  cultures  for
actual products.

CNN  attempted to trace the cultures  being bought from the growers.  Although
the vendor  claimed that it was all going to a beauty supply  manufacturer  in
CA, it appears that it all actually gets reprocessed into "starter kits" which
are sold to new growers.

Regards,                                                Hewlett-Packard
Bob "wanna buy some USENET bonds?" Niland               3404 East Harmony Road
hplabs!hpfcla!rjn                                       Fort Collins CO  80525