[net.sport.hockey] Bye Bye Team USA!!!!

dick@alberta.UUCP (Dick Foster) (02/11/84)

	So the "magnificent" Team USA hockey team got blown away by
the "lowly" Canadian team in the first round. I love it.
	We've been hearing and seeing so much of the USA team in the
last few months (mostly from American sports reporters who have not
clue one about the game of hockey). It appears that the Yankee team
officials don't know the game too well either as witnessed by some of
their statements and actions in the last few days:
	- The ridiculous attempt to assure themselves a Game 1 victory
over Canada by creating the disqualification scene. All they really
managed to do was give the Canadians the extra emotional push they
needed.
	- The tournament against the Soviet junior team that apparently
convinced so many that the US team was capable of beating the
Russian national team.
	It's not just the team USA officials that are to blame, of course.
The NHL is trying desperately to sell hockey more aggressively in the
US market.  What better way to increase the public's awareness in hockey
than to create excitement over the chances of the American Olympic team?
	The USA has never been a hockey power, and they likely won't be
for many years to come.  The gold medal won four years ago was more luck
than anything else - the Soviets were preparing more for the finals and
found themselves unprepared for a highly emotional US team.  This year
everyone is gunning for the Americans, and the results thus far would
indicate it.
	Also, I also heard ABC would send about 300 technicians home
if the Americans fail to qualify for the medal round.  It shows how
much *real* interest there is in the game of hockey versus interest
in mere flag waving.
					alberta!dick

fargo@ihuxx.UUCP (Matt Noah) (02/13/84)

"alberta!dick",
		Are you for real?  Does your mother still like you?
Matt Noah

tischler@ihuxv.UUCP (Mark D. Tischler) (02/13/84)

Dick,

    The American officials were absolutely right in trying to disqualify the
Canadian players.  They signed pro contracts, and if you look at the rules,
you'll find that it states clearly that these players should be ruled
ineligible.

    If your team lost, wouldn't you send home extra people who were
expected to have covered the medal round matches?  There are more interesting
and pertinent things for American viewers to watch than hockey matches between
two other countries.  Obviously, if you're not going to broadcast these hockey
games which you wholly expected to broadcast, then you're not going to need all
your manpower.

    Finally, did you ever hear the term "sore winner"?  If not, you should
learn the meaning of the term from your own actions.

					Mark

fargo@ihuxx.UUCP (Matt Noah) (02/15/84)

"alberta!lake",
		Does anyone at the University of Alberta respect
		anything or anyone besides themselves or the Canadian
		Olympic team?  You obviously have not followed
		Olympic hockey very long to realize the issues involved
		in amateur status and Eastern bloc interpretations of
		amateurism.  Perhaps the Soviets would have an NHL if
		they weren't communists - you are owned by the government
		there so either everyone is a professional or everyone
		is an amateur.  Are you beginning to understand?
		The Canadians bastardized the concept of amateurism in
		this Olympics in an effort to further the cause of allowing
		professionals to compete in Olympic Hockey.  The Soviets
		are obviously using the best in their country - why not send
		Wayne Gretzky, et. al. and let them practice as a team four
		years prior to participating in the Olympics?
		Also, why criticize the USA for protesting?  It is completely
		within our rights to protest.  We, at least send amateurs
		to the Games.  Also, we put more talent on the Canadian
		team through the NCAA college program than you could ever
		hope to help through the Canadian college program.
		Flatley (Wisconsin), Wilson (Dartmouth), Patrick (UND),
		Tippet (UND) to name a few.
		One possible ramification of Canada's actions at these Olympics
		is to restrict the number of foreign players on NCAA sanctioned
		intercollegiate athletic teams.  
		Even with the ill will created by this Olympics between the
		US and Canada, I still wish the Canadians the best in their
		effort to embarass the Soviets once again.
Matt Noah

wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP (T C Wheeler) (02/17/84)

Hold it! Hold it!  If my memory serves me right, the protest against
the Canadian players was filed by Norway not the US.  The US was
trying to lay low due to some possible irregularities concerning
their own players.  Let's not get into a border war over who did
what to whom.  There just ain't no way, in my opinion, that the
US team was going to get to the medal round this year.  They didn't
seem to have it all together from last fall on.  Sitting on the
Russians last fall was not hard to do since that was not the real
Russian team, but one sent here to give us a false sense of security.

I, for one, am going to root like Hell for Team Canada to beat the
stuffings out of the Red Army Pros, (even if they might be nice
guys individually).  

"UP THE MAPLE LEAF"

"GO GET EM CANUKS"

T. C. Wheeler