[net.micro.pc] DesQ Review

JEFF@JPL-VLSI.ARPA (06/11/84)

From:  Jeff Skaletsky <JEFF@JPL-VLSI.ARPA>

I have been playing with DesQ for about 2 weeks, now, on an IBM
XT with 640K RAM and the color display.  I would like to add my
comments:

Positive:

Quite a toy.  It's fun to customize everything up the wazoo.  Makes me
wish I had a mouse.  The windows work well, esp. with colors.  The
shortcuts provided are very welcome (close a window, switch windows,
zoom/unzoom, etc).

Once you get used to it, installing a new package and setting up
macros is quite easy... just be sure to quit DesQ and save after
each install, so you don't lose it when the system crashes on the
next install (see notes on communcations programs)

The macros are great.  I've got it entering Smarterm, choosing
the configuration and hitting the function keys to dial; I just
watch.

Providing the ability to edit the menus and create submenus was a
nice idea. you can still interface with the operating system,
although it isn't mentioned in the book.  Just create a menu
option which runs a batch file setting your prompt and path, etc.

The provided "Agents" are nice;  WordStar, Dbase, and Supercalc3 are the
ones I use, and the transfer ability works well.  I also use Leading
Edge, Final Word, and ESP (a neat little editor roughly based on INED
written by a guy from Rand named Bill Rodgers; $75, worth checking out)
and these programs all do direct screen access: therefore, the only
windows are full screen.  WordStar, which I feel has a terrible
implementation on the PC, works really well in the windows, and the
mark and transfer does the ^KB/^KK stuff for you.  The included DesQ
Notepad is nice, and serves as an all-around scratchpad and text editor.

I was a little disappointed about speed, too, until I boosted my
buffers in CONFIG.SYS to the recommended 30 (30!);  the program
then ran pretty well.  Of course there are some delays, but
considering what the program is doing, I was not too put out.

Negatives:

Not the easiest program to install as a novice.  The average user
will need the most customizing, and I'm afraid it'll be the
hardest for them. 

Installing and using communications programs is about the
hardest.  There is some help in the manual, but hard to find.  I
was almost convinced PC-TALK just wasn't compatible when I found
something about tests for input and how to allow for them. 
Forget Smartcom II, and don't "put away" a comm program.. close
it, or your micro will probably crash.  Kermit works just fine,
btw.

It will absolutely not work with any ramdisk drivers I
have, and will not even let me access my Flagstaff Engineering 8
inch disk.  Apparently the driver uses areas that DesQ wants.
Trying to run DesQ merely gives you the DOS prompt back, and
there is nothing in the install procedure to warn you about this. 
This is major!

Summing up:

Yes, Quarterdeck has something here; they should develop more agents,
but I think that DesQ could be a viable alternative to the standard way
of using the PC (XT, of course: you need 1.5 MB just for the program)
especially if you already have all of your software.  Even programmers
and hackers could use it, if they aren't TOO speed conscious (and I think
they'll prefer to use DOS occasionally).  As an in-house micro
consultant, I work in constant interrupt mode.  I like being able to
"freeze" my edit or spreadsheet and format a disk for someone, or take
notes on a phone conversation.  Of course, we will soon be seeing
Framework, which I suspect will work in a similar manner, but I hope
that Quarterdeck will also reduce their price ($399 list) at which time
DesQ will be quite a deal.  "Try before you buy" will be difficult, I
think, since you really have to *work* with DesQ before you know whether
you like it.  The jury's still out for me, too.  Anyone else used it yet?

Jeff Skaletsky <Jeff@JPL-VLSI>