[net.micro.pc] ibm dos 3.1 vs 2.0

hagens@uwvax.UUCP (Rob Hagens) (05/16/85)

I have an XT. As an experiment, I booted dos 3.1 from floppy. I then
used 'sys' to transfer dos to the hard disk. 3.1 would boot from the disk.
Then I tried booting 2.0 from floppy. Again I used 'sys' to transfer
2.0 to the hard disk. Now I can't boot from the hard disk. If I transfer
3.1 over, I can boot from the hard disk. 

The question is: why, after installing dos 3.1, is it impossible to 
install 2.0 so as to boot from it? (I realize  I can get back to 2.0 
by reformating the disk, but I would rather not).


Rob Hagens
-- 
Rob Hagens @ wisconsin
...!{allegra,heurikon,ihnp4,seismo,sfwin,ucbvax,uwm-evax}!uwvax!hagens
hagens@wisc-rsch.arpa

brown@nicmad.UUCP (05/17/85)

> I have an XT. As an experiment, I booted dos 3.1 from floppy. I then
> used 'sys' to transfer dos to the hard disk. 3.1 would boot from the disk.
> Then I tried booting 2.0 from floppy. Again I used 'sys' to transfer
> 2.0 to the hard disk. Now I can't boot from the hard disk. If I transfer
> 3.1 over, I can boot from the hard disk. 
> 
> The question is: why, after installing dos 3.1, is it impossible to 
> install 2.0 so as to boot from it? (I realize  I can get back to 2.0 
> by reformating the disk, but I would rather not).

You didn't say anything about the COMMAND.COM file.  I am assuming that you
didn't move that as well.  If you didn't that would make it not work.  If
you did, you got me.  I haven't tried that experiment yet, and don't plan
to (I don't want to go back to any version of 2.xx)
-- 
              |------------|
              | |-------| o|    JVC HRD725U 
Mr. Video     | |       | o|  |--------------|
              | |       |  |  | |----| o o o |
              | |-------| O|  |--------------|
              |------------|     VHS Hi-Fi (the only way to go)
   ({!seismo,!ihnp4}!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!brown)