davet@oakhill.UUCP (Dave Trissel) (06/05/85)
In article <1494@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) writes: > > ... What he does say is for programs >that require less than 64K of data, a 286 competes nicely with a 68020. > Perhaps the west coast didn't recieve Dan Tso's Unix benchmarks? It seems both the 286/310 and IBM PC/AT lost almost all 10 of them against a 10 Megahertz MC68010. [Thats MC68010 - not MC68020.] > >>In article <588@intelca.UUCP> kds@intelca.UUCP (Ken Shoemaker) writes: >>>maybe Dave realizes that for programs that require less than 64K of data >>>that a 12MHz 286 actually keeps pace with the 16.67 MHz 68020. Hummm. Looks like Ken never saw them either. Should they be reposted? Dave Trissel {seismo,ihnp4}!ut-sally!oakhill!davet Motorola Semiconductor Inc.