[net.micro.pc] Query: software for disk -> tape backup

maslen@LaBrea.UUCP (06/08/86)

I've inherited a PC/XT clone with two 360K floppies, a 10Mb hard disk and a
10Mb tape drive.  It's fairly important to provide fast, simple backup so that
the person doing data entry is inspired to do backups at least once a day.

The tape drive claims to be an InterDyne ID1010; it comes with an installable
device driver (nice; you can treat it as a disk, albeit painfully slow),
programs called TFORMAT, TBACKUP, TRESTORE and TVERIFY (which look like hacks
to the equivalent DOS programs for floppies) and a six-page "software manual"
that lapses into Jinglish.  Perhaps my problem is just one of documentation,
but it seemed that:
	- TRESTORE pulls all the files off the tape.  Allegedly TBACKUP writes
	  things so that "... the files on the tape drive may be accessed in
	  the same manner as a floppy disk drive in 10 megabyte volume
	  incriments (sic)", but I'm not sure this helps all that much.
	- TBACKUP couldn't fit all of my 10Mb disk on one tape, although "each
	  reel has the (sic) formatted capacity of 10.48 megabytes" (and I
	  thought I told it only to write real files, not the whole disk
	  drive, but maybe I'm deluded).
	- twenty minutes (minimum) feels like a long time to back up a
	  not-very-full 10Mb disk; the person who does the data entry would
	  rather go home.  Does it really take that long to write the tape if
	  you access it intelligently (i.e. don't seek forward and back all
	  the time)?

So...
	* Does anyone out there have one of these tape drives and put it to
	  good use (if so, how?)
	* Is there any good general-purpose backup software, either public
	  domain or commercial, that might do the trick?  I've seen IBU and
	  it's nice, but interactiveness is not really what we want.
	  Something more like (Berkeley?) Unix /etc/dump would be great.
	  ("dump all the files that have changed since the last level 9 dump")
	  Something that knew it was dealing with a tape drive, and optimized
	  its block usage accordingly, would also be great.  Intelligent
	  management of subdirectories is essential; other goodies, such as
	  compression, would be nice but aren't vital.

Replies to me - I'll try not to pollute the net unless lots of people voice
their interest.

Thanks in advance,
	Thomas Maslen.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard disclaimer: I'm just a student here, I don't agree with all the
    University's opinions and I'm sure it (??) doesn't agree with all mine.

USnail:	PO Box 10813, Stanford, CA 94305-0317
Email:	maslen@LaBrea.UUCP, maslen@su-labrea.ARPA, maslen@labrea.stanford.edu
	(if "labrea" doesn't work, then "sushi" (really) or "pescadero").
Phone:	(415)723-4096 (shared office), (415)856-8554 (home, never)