jjh@se-sd.UUCP (06/05/86)
---
I'm in the market for a Modula-2 compiler for my IBM clone, and I'd like
to hear from people who've had experience with the various available
compilers. Currently I'm looking at compilers from three companies:
Logitech, Interface Technologies, and Workman and Associates
(currently available for CP/M only but ready for DOS Real Soon Now).
I'm particularly concerned that the compiler does NOT have a 64K space
limitation (a la Turbo Pascal), and that it be able to produce EXE files.
The ability to import code generated from other compilers would also be
a plus. Anyone out there had good/bad experiences using the above
compilers? Are there other compiliers "out there" that I haven't heard
about? Any experiences/opinions you may care to relate will be greatly
appreciated.
Jim Hayes
Disclaimer: My opinions are correct; they are, therefore, probably
not those of my employer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
"A statesman -- is a dead politician" | Jim Hayes
"Lord knows we need more statesmen" | ...!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!se-sd!jjhzemon@fritz.UUCP (06/12/86)
I have Interface Technologies' M2-SDS and am pretty happy with
it. It is less slick than the LogiTech product seems to be from
reading the ads but is a lot less expensive. All I wanted was
something to let me learn about the language and I'm satisfied
with the product for that. I'd rather develop serious code in C
simply because my Aztec C compiler has a *much* better runtime
library. (Has anyone replicated the power of the standard I/O
library in a Modula module?)
The tech support people are very helpful and knowledgable.
Furthermore, ITC runs a Fidonet BBS in Texas. Some sections are
reserved for customers (like M2-SDS updates and bug fixes) and
the sysops are the tech support people.
-- Art Z.
--
-- Art Zemon
FileNet Corp.
...! {decvax, ihnp4, ucbvax} !trwrb!felix!zemon