[net.startrek] destruct revisited

boyajian@akov68.DEC (Jerry Boyajian) (08/14/84)

> From:	pur-ee!dwm           11-Aug-1984 06:55:36  
>
> Why couldn't the Enterprise have exploded on the far side of the planet 
> and simply not have lit up the sky because the planet shadowed the effect?

No reason at all, actually. That's not the problem, though. When the anti-matter
in the ship's engines was released due to the self-destruct, it's contact with
near-by matter should have created an explosion that would have taken out the
entire planet.

Hmmm, something else just occurred to me. If the Genesis-created planet aged and
self-destructed because of the use of protomatter, why didn't the Genesis-creat-
ed sun?

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, Maynard, MA)

UUCP:	{decvax|ihnp4|allegra|ucbvax|...}!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian
ARPA:	boyajian%akov68.DEC@DECWRL.ARPA

hartwig@ihuxo.UUCP (The Shaggy DA) (08/15/84)

<for the line self-destruct>

>Hmmm, something else just occurred to me. If the Genesis-created
>planet aged and self-destructed because of the use of protomatter,
>why didn't the Genesis-created sun?

NOTE: The following speculations are based on the assumption that the
      Genesis solar system follows our solar system as a model.

I don't remember seeing the sun after(or during) the destruction
of the planet. The chances of the sun self-destructing(going nova)
would be slim, because it is the same type of star as our sun(a red
dwarf). The Genesis sun could have been expanding rapidly into a
red giant, as it aged, thus changing the gravitational and climatic
effects(remember the wind?) on the planet. So the planet breaks up
with the help of the increased gravity pull from the enlarging sun.

                               Max Hartwig
                               ..!ihnp4!ihuxo!hartwig

mcdaniel@uiucdcsb.UUCP (08/16/84)

#R:ihuxo:-36100:uiucdcsb:16000004:000:753
uiucdcsb!mcdaniel    Aug 16 01:33:00 1984

You know, there is such a thing as the speed of light.  If the sun had gone
nova at the "same instant" as the planet blew up, the light and other effects
from its explosion would have arrived on the order of 10 minutes later --
long enough for the Bird of Prey to get out.

The sun and the planet need not explode simultaneously, or even when the
signal from one's explosion reaches the other at light speed.  The planet
just may have happened to blow up well before the sun.  (You have two
different mixtures of nitro plus other stuff, on an increasingly vibrating
surface.  Which one goes off first? Unpredicable and unrepeatable.  Chem people:
please don't flame if the nitro actually wouldn't blow up in such
circumstances -- just see the analogy.)

friedman@uiucdcs.UUCP (08/16/84)

#R:decwrl:-332300:uiucdcs:24900059:000:1006
uiucdcs!friedman    Aug 16 08:51:00 1984

> Hmmm, something else just occurred to me. If the Genesis-created planet
> aged and self-destructed because of the use of protomatter, why didn't
> the Genesis-created sun?

Well, it did, if you believe the novelization.  In that version, the planet
spiraled in and dropped into the sun, and afterward (if I remember it
correctly), the Genesis sun novaed, producing something like the original
nebula.  The main problem I see with this is that Kirk and Co. could not
have observed it; it would have taken at least a good fraction of a year
(a Genesis-planet year, but even so, much more time than they were around).

The second time I watched the movie, I was watching the planet carefully
as they escaped aboard the Bird of Prey, with jets of lava spewing out
behind them.  And I'm not so sure you can conclude from those lava jets
that the planet actually exploded.  Perhaps it was merely shooting out
jets of lava (compare the height of the sulphur-lava known to be ejected
by Jupiter's satellite Io).

bsa@ncoast.UUCP (The WITNESS) (08/17/84)

[The world is a Klein bottle]

> From: boyajian@akov68.DEC (Jerry Boyajian)

> Hmmm, something else just occurred to me. If the Genesis-created planet aged and
> self-destructed because of the use of protomatter, why didn't the Genesis-creat-
> ed sun?

According to the novel, it DID... after the scene of the action shifted away
from Genesis ("How convenient!" :-).

--bsa
-- 
  Brandon Allbery: decvax!cwruecmp{!atvax}!ncoast!bsa: R0176@CSUOHIO.BITNET
   					       ^ Note name change!
	 6504 Chestnut Road, Independence, OH 44131 <> (216) 524-1416

"The more they overthink the plumbin', the easier 'tis tae stop up the drain."