[net.startrek] Flame on "DEATH TO ALL ZAEON PIGS!"

dxa@bentley.UUCP (DR Anolick) (09/19/84)

<The line-eater is dead, but will probably return to haunt us again!>



       I've been reading the net for about a month now, but this is
       my  first  posting,  so  I hope I don't break any netiquette
       rules.

       I have been disturbed by Michael N. Washington's  signature.
       This  is  not  a  personal  attack  on Michael, I've enjoyed
       reading his postings.  However, I believe that  the  phrase,
       "DEATH TO ALL ZAEON PIGS!" is inappropriate for this net.

       The phrase in question comes from the episode which examines
       the  Nazi  Regime,  and  the  message of the episode is that
       absolute power corrupts absolutely.  The  phrase  shows  the
       negative effect of that absolute power.

       The episode was a good one, maybe the problem is  that  when
       the  phrase is taken out of context, you lose the message of
       the episode.  When reading the phrase, my perception is that
       it  is  glorifying  a bigoted ideal.  (Again, I don't accuse
       Michael of being a  bigot, I'm  just  stating  what  my  gut
       reaction is when I read the phrase.) It  seems  to  me  that
       since  this  net  celebrates  the  positive attitude of Star
       Trek, that a negative statement such as this phrase  is  not
       appropriate.   Let  me  add,  that  I  am not unbiased in my
       feelings.  Being a Jew, the ideal behind this phrase has  an
       added significance to me.

       I'd like to see some discussion of this on the net.   Again,
       I  am not attacking Michael, I doubt that he means to offend
       anyone with his signature.  Because of human diversity,  and
       since  the  net  is so large, I'm sure every posting offends
       someone, somewhere.  But I'd like to see some discussion  of
       this  signature.  Am I over sensative due to my bias?  Or do
       others agree, that when taken out of context, this phrase is
       not a positive Star Trek statement?  

       Thanks in advance for any _thoughtful_ responses.


                       DROYAN                  ..ihnp4!bentley!dxa
                       (David ROY ANolick)

rjnoe@ihlts.UUCP (Roger Noe) (09/19/84)

First off, I think David did a very good job of raising a thoughtful issue
and observing good netiquette.  Such consideration should be commended.

>	the message of the episode [Patterns of Force] is that
>	absolute power corrupts absolutely. The phrase shows the
>	negative effect of that absolute power.

I have to disagree with that.  The real message of the episode is that
those who fail to learn from history (in this case John Gill, a history
professor) are doomed to repeat past mistakes.

>	When reading the phrase, my perception is that it is glorifying
>	a bigoted ideal.  Am I over sensative due to my bias? Or do
>	others agree, that when taken out of context, this phrase is
>	not a positive Star Trek statement? 
>		DROYAN         ..ihnp4!bentley!dxa

I agree both ways.  You are probably a little sensitive because of personal
feelings but the statement IS very negative, taken out of context.  The point
to remember is that most readers of this newsgroup cannot take the quote out of
context, because they remember the episode, what happened to the Nazis and what
happened to Melakon and his regime.  It disturbed me a bit, too, the first time
I read it, but I have no rational objection to using a quote of any sort in
one's signature line.
--
"It's only by NOT taking the human race seriously that I retain what
    fragments of my once considerable mental powers I still possess."
Roger Noe			ihnp4!ihlts!rjnoe

friedman@uiucdcs.UUCP (09/20/84)

> I have been disturbed by Michael N. Washington's  signature.
> This  is  not  a  personal  attack  on Michael, I've enjoyed
> reading his postings.  However, I believe that  the  phrase,
> "DEATH TO ALL ZAEON PIGS!" is inappropriate for this net.

I have to agree that I am still startled every time I see that
signature line.  I also do not intend a personal attack of Michael
Washington.  But I have often wondered what is his point in including
this quotation in his signature.  (I'm hoping he'll tell us.)
Since the line suggests racial bigotry	against a fictional race,
it comes out meaningless to me -- and yet somewhat disturbing.

jim@randvax.UUCP (Jim Gillogly) (09/20/84)

----
Well, yes, I do think you're a little oversensitive (albeit understandably
so).  I just took the quotation as a bit of black humor, like
"Nuke the whales" or the anti-"I <heart> <foo>" bumper sticker that reads
"I <club symbol from playing card> baby seals."  All unworthy sentiments, of
course...

	Jim Gillogly

"Why didn't you say so?  All you had to do was explain it to me!" (Bela Oxmix)