okamoto@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU (Doctor Who) (10/31/85)
In article <1170@decwrl.UUCP>, timpson@comet.DEC writes: > > In "The Mark of Gideon" What were the two coordinates used > by the Gideon counsel to deceive the Enterprise crew and where > did each one go? > The coordinates given for Kirk to beam down were: 875-020-079. These dropped him onto the fake Enterprise. The coordinates for the Gideon council chamber were: 875-020-709. And now for something completely different. In "The Enemy Within", the transporter malfunction caused there to be two different, yet identical Kirks. Where did the transporter get the mass to materialize this Kirk? Did it only materialize one half of the "Good Kirk", leaving the rest to form the "Bad Kirk", in which case each Kirk would only weigh half as much as the original? Or did it perhaps tap into the warp engines to get the energy (a whole lot!) to convert into matter? The New Number Who, okamoto@BERKELY.EDU Jeff Okamoto ..!ucbvax!okamoto Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfernspledenschlittcrasscrenbonfriedigger- dingledangledongleburesteinvonkanckerthrasherapplebangerhorowitzicol- ensicgranderknottspelltinklegrandlichgrumblemeyerspeltorwasserkurst- lichimmleeisenbahnwagengutenabendbitteeinneurnburgerbratwurstlegger- spurtenmitzweimacherluberhundsfutgumberabeshonenedankerkablsfleich- mittleraucher von Hauptkof ap Rabinski of Ulm.
ccs020@ucdavis.UUCP (Kevin Chu) (11/01/85)
[...] > > And now for something completely different. > > In "The Enemy Within", the transporter malfunction caused there to > be two different, yet identical Kirks. Where did the transporter > get the mass to materialize this Kirk? Did it only materialize > one half of the "Good Kirk", leaving the rest to form the "Bad Kirk", > in which case each Kirk would only weigh half as much as the original? > Or did it perhaps tap into the warp engines to get the energy > (a whole lot!) to convert into matter? > > The New Number Who, okamoto@BERKELY.EDU > Jeff Okamoto ..!ucbvax!okamoto The subject of transporters was run into the ground last spring. PLEASE don't resurrect it again. It was decided that the transporter is the biggest Star Trek inconsistancy of them all. -- --Kevin Chu ..!{ucbvax,lll-crg,dual}!ucdavis!vega!ccs020