[net.micro.68k] info on Unix-lookalikes

biggers@topaz.ARPA (Mark Biggers) (01/30/85)

Hello again,

Recent responses to my original posting querying the net about
Unix-lookalike ** OSs ** for "small" 68k micros have me wondering if
people read the request.

I like 4.2BSD Unix also, even though most of my work is done under
System V.  BUT there ain't no way that 4.2 (or probably) System V
is gonna run on these new atari machines, or hardware like the Sage IV
which I used in the past.

I am interested in Uniflex and OS9-68000 for the very reason a lot of
system developers might have - (alleged) good performance on minimal
hardware like that above.  I have heard lots of good about OS-9 running
on the RS Color Computer, and gosh, if that ain't minimal hardware, I
don't know what is.

Yes, you can run Unix-like systems with no memory management, and get
good performance.  Our Sage IV port of Idris (whitesmith's) used a
version of Idris-68k that allowed for a portion of memory to be used
as a swap cache.  We could run 3-4 users on a Sage IV with pretty good
performance - the only slowdown was that the CPU had to manage disk-head
seeks on this machine.

MY experience with Idris and CRDS' UNOS has shown that at least these
look-alikes had some nice features.  "Real" UNIX shines in its maturity
of utilities and familiar features, over the look-alikes.

I guess I should quit being lazy and just *write* to these companies
(TSC and Microware :^).

Mark
seismo!rutopaz!biggers

fair@dual.UUCP (Erik E. Fair) (02/06/85)

In my experience, compatibles aren't.

My one extensive experience with a ``compatible'' was Charles River
Data System Universe 68  with their UNOS operating system (the
particular version of which was claimed to be System V compatible).
UNOS for those who do not know, was reverse engineered from V6 UNIX.
To me, ``compatible'' means that if I take an application from System
V, it will compile and run on the system with minimal changes. The
particular application made extensive use of the System V tty driver,
which UNOS didn't even have any compatability for, and I had a tough time
getting the sucker to work.

The other system I've looked at briefly is Idris, which is also
(originally) reverse engineered from V6, and seemed to be missing a lot
of the typical UNIX utilities when I looked (this was a *very* cursory
glance at a show, however, so this in no way can be considered
definitive).

There are other compatibles out there that I have not looked at (e.g.
COHERENT from Mark Williams & Co.).

In my opinion, if what you want is UNIX, don't waste time with the
``compatibles.''

	Erik E. Fair	ucbvax!fair	fair@ucb-arpa.ARPA

	dual!fair@BERKELEY.ARPA
	{ihnp4,ucbvax,cbosgd,hplabs,decwrl,unisoft,fortune,sun,nsc}!dual!fair
	Dual Systems Corporation, Berkeley, California