lew (04/14/83)
I posted an equation for the pressure of an isothermal atmosphere in a linearly increasing gravitational field: p(z) = p1 * exp( -(mg/kT) * 1/2 * z^2/R ) where p1 is the pressure at z=0 and g is the g-field value at z=R . The formula applies to the pressure in a deep shaft, drilled from the surface. It is obtained by integrating the differential equation for the pressure: dp = -q * g(z) * dz = -(p*m/kT) * (g*z/R) * dz dp/p = -(mg/kT) * z/R * dz log(p) = -(mg/kT) * 1/2 * z^2/R + constant Here, q is the mass density and it goes to (p*m/kT) by the ideal gas law. g(z)=g*z/R is an expression of the linear increase of gravity from 0 at the center (z=0) to g at the surface (z=R). If you adjust p1 to give p(R)=p0, and then compare the values obtained for z<R with the values obtained from a downward extrapolation of the exponential atmosphere, you will find that the former are less than the later. The values diverge slowly as z decreases from z=R. The value at z=0 is the square root of the value obtained from a downward extrapolation of the exponential atmosphere, in units of p0. Lew Mammel, Jr. ihuxr!lew
warren (04/14/83)
I believe the pressure calculations assume that there is an infinite amount of air available to fill up the whole after it is drilled. With such large pressures, there may not be enough air in the earths atmosphere to ignore the effect of the loss of air from above ground into the hole. As long as we are having fun calculating, how big (diameter) does the whole through the earth have to be in order to a "significant" amount of the atmosphere into the center of the earth? This begins to sound like a good plot for a bad sci-fi movie. -- Warren Montgomery ihnss!warren IH x2494
soreff (04/15/83)
Is the assumption of an isothermal compression really valid? I was under the impression that the temperature variation in the atmosphere was better modeled with an *adiabatic* compression. This gives a power law, rather than an exponential law for pressure or density increase with depth. -Jeffrey Soreff (hplabs!soreff)
Schauble.HIS_Guest@MIT-MULTICS (04/15/83)
Unfortunately, I don't have time this week to check your equation, but... You make several references to a linearly INCREASING gravitational field. In the case we are considering, the field is DECREASING, ranging from 1G at the surface to 0 G at the center. Is this the case your equation is drawn for?? Paul