[net.physics] A different ice question

rjs (04/13/83)

At various times in my life, I have been told by people, in a matter of
fact way, that warm water will freeze in an ice cube tray (in the freezer)
faster than cold water.  They always claim that experiments have been
done which show this (but of course never supply references).  Normally
I just toss this off as being an old wive's tale, however, recently a
person with a Chemistry degree also made this claim, making vague references
to convection currents in the water.

If you ignore convection currents, the warm water would take some time x
to cool to the temperature of cold water, and then time y to freeze, but
cold to start with water would just take time y to freeze.  It also seems
to me that with convection currents doing their thing, the time to go from
warm to cold will still be much larger than the time it takes friction to
drag those currents to a halt once cold water temp. has been reached.

What gives?  Is there really evidence for such a counterintuitive
phenomenon, or am I the victim of a massive practical joke?

	Robert Snyder
	floyd!rjs

leichter (04/13/83)

This topic - warm water freezing faster than cold - has been discussed
before, both here and in Scientific American's "Amateur Scientist" column
a couple of years ago.  Conclusions:

	1.  It really does work for appropriate choices of water temperatures;
	2.  The principle cause is evaporation; much of the warm water
		evaporates, taking a great deal of heat with it, while at
		the same time reducing the volume of water left to freeze.
		Thus, you quickly end up with water at the same temperature
		as the cold water is at, but there is less of it.  Since
		further cooling occurs at the surfaces, and in most containers
		the available surface area is the same for full and partially
		full containers, a smaller volume of water will freeze faster.

BTW, you CAN'T ignore convection currents, either; they probably contribute,
although not as much.
							-- Jerry
						decvax!yale-comix!leichter
							leichter@yale

rjs (04/15/83)

I received a number of letters regarding my inquiry as to whether or
not warm water freezes faster than cold water.  Many of them refered
to a Scientific American Amature Scientist article on the subject, so
I looked back through my old issues and found it in the September 1977
issue.  This was the special issue on microelectronics which may explain
why so many people knew about it.  This article does make the claim
that hot water freezes faster than cold.  It also says that the explaination
is still the subject of controversy.  The possible reasons offered are
better circulation of hot water, hot water contains less dissolved gas, and
that hot water loses a substantial amount of mass to evaporation, so you
are actually freezing less water.

The author then goes on to present the results of his experiments, which
show a definite drop off in freezing time after a certain temperature
which depends on the conditions (amount of water, size of container, type
of freezer, covered or uncovered container).  In any case, looking at
his data, it still seems that cold tap water (usually < 20 deg. C.) than
water that is warmer (but still water i.e. < 100 deg. C.).  The turnover
point on his data occurs in the 60-80 deg. C. range.

My conclusion is that you are still better off using cold water as you
don't have to pay to heat the water then cool off that heat.  Also,
you don't want to run the risk of getting rid of all the dissolved
gasses or the ice won't float (just kidding).

Thanks to all who answered.

	Robert Snyder
	floyd!rjs

gwyn@Brl-Vld.ARPA (04/15/83)

From:      Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn@Brl-Vld.ARPA>

I do know that putting hot water into the ice cube trays to freeze gives
much clearer ice cubes, since very little air is trapped inside.

kk9w (04/18/83)

I think the joke is on you.  The same thing can be said about cold water
heating up faster than warm water.  If you agree with the statement, then
to prove you wrong, the person who started the thing says that the total
heat up time is what we are talking about, but if you disagree with the
statement then what is being talked about is the rate of heating up (dQ/dt).

Either way the thing is kind of funny.

Dave Andersen

pur-ee!kk9w