mac@uvacs.UUCP (10/02/83)
re: Fusion Waste, &c. See Scientific American for this month. re: Fission Waste, &c. (* sigh *) This has turned into the kind of discussion that we have come to expect from a network of self-proclaimed hacks, people who espouse Objectivism and argue about "Rational" psychology while admitting that they haven't the slightest idea what it is, folks who decry the intrusion of politics into the scientific business of living, who want to turn useful tools into artificial intelligences, folks who are trying to learn computer "science" without math, who divide by 0. There, I've lumped us all together. This is standard rhetoric, on the order of "when did your wife stop beating you?". I hope I haven't offended anyone. A statement such as this doesn't deserve a response. Please reply to me by mail, not through net.physics. Let's discuss physics of flames, not vice versa.