[net.physics] Query - re. Speed o Light

CSvax:Pucc-H:ab3@pur-ee.UUCP (10/07/83)

	ellis@flairvax disagreed with my comments vis-a-vis travelling
down the NJ Turnpike at the speed of light...I said:

> 2. If you are driving at C, then you have transgressed the {known,
> well-understood, apparent -- pick one} laws of the universe and you will be
> stopped by the next traffic cop, who will of course catch you by riding a
> tachyon-constituted motorcycle.

	and he (quite correctly) pointed out

> Now wait... going the speed of light is not in violation of any law of
> physics I know! To my knowledge, your clock slows down as you approach the
> speed of light, and completely stops should that speed ever be attained.

	and went on to say by by dumping mass ( say, by converting it to
the energy used for acceleration ) one could achieve a zero-mass state, in
which case C is indeed attainable; photons do it all the time!

	I agree; but I was *assuming* that the original submitter (srm@pyuxnn)
was specifying a physical object (with non-zero mass) with a light-producing 
element on the front.

	That'll teach me to assume!

Darth Wombat