rjnoe@ihlts.UUCP (10/18/83)
/* MINOR FLAME */ "Any comments," you ask? How can one bother to comment intelligently on the ideas of one who has his head so far up his *ss he inhales his own lunch? [I know that's gross and silly, not to mention an anatomical impossibility, but it's descriptive.] He didn't have one fact straight and all his "evidence" is bogus (i.e. unscientific). Let's see someone demonstrate creation as a reproducible experiment--if I could I'd leave this guy out of MY universe! I seriously considered attending this presentation just so I could laugh at the speaker, but I'm glad I didn't; stupidity frustrates me because I like to think there's some hope for our species. -- Roger Noe ...ihnp4!ihlts!rjnoe
krueger@uiuccsb.UUCP (10/24/83)
#R:ihlts:-23100:uiuccsb:10800006:000:429 uiuccsb!krueger Oct 23 16:02:00 1983 Re: Roger Noe's "minor flame": I think that was significantly more than a "minor flame," and hardly a statement which provides "hope for our species." Other comments: Personally, I find discussions and research regarding how to work with the present state of biology and astronomy much more interesting than conjecture about how it came to be this way. The former contributes more directly to the enhancement of technology.