[net.physics] QFT

don@allegra.UUCP (D. Mitchell) (04/12/84)

Yes, there are serious philosophical problems with quantum field
theories.  The approach is popular because of the great success with
QED and the unification of Electroweak forces.  Many physicist feel
that QCD, the proposed strong nuclear theory, is correct but difficult
to prove.  The current approximate methods of evaluating the equations
(perturbation theory) give divergent series.

There are some very beautiful things about these theories.  When one
attempts to assemble the minimally complex theory that makes the
electron field locally gauge invariant, adding the photon field does it
just right.  Furthermore, the photon must be massless.

With regard to renormalization, it is difficult to make judgements.  I
think it is possible that a final all-inclusive theory of elementary
processes will be found.  There is no guarantee that this theory will
be intuitive or easy to understand.  We are only capable of
"understanding" Newtonian physics, and it is just plan incorrect!

Since we are dropping names, I recall that Feynmann told us (the field
theory class) that he had long been unhappy with renormalization, but
that the new formalism that came out of the Weinberg Salam theory had
convinced him that it was not just an ad hoc trick.  Who knows?