[net.physics] Remark: Curvature of space and thought experiments

gjphw@ihuxm.UUCP (05/31/84)

   This brief item is a comment upon a comment made about thought experiments,
 and an anecdote about the curvature of space.

   E. Turner (astrovax!elt) seems to have made one unfortunate statement
 concerning the value of thought experiments.  The most famous proponent of
 thought experiments was probably A. Einstein, but these experiments were not
 used to demonstrate or prove anything.  Instead, Einstein used thought
 experiments to clarify concepts surrounding physical phenomena.  It appears
 dangerous to me to suggest that thought experiments can serve to prove
 anything.  They should only be used to clarify concepts (are you reading
 this, Sarfatti?).

   Also, you should be concerned about the caliber of the individual who is to
 perform these thought experiments with you.  Einstein used Max Born and Max
 Planck as sounding boards for his thought experiments.  Unfortunately, I
 cannot claim to have acquaintances of similar stature or promise for my
 thought experiments.

   As has been discussed, one of the predictions of general relativity (now
 often called Einstein theory) is that the curvature of space becomes
 significant near massive objects.  Since light follows the path of least
 action (Fermat's principle), the light path should deflect with the curvature
 of space.  Einstein calculated this bending for light traveling very near the
 Sun, and the (at that time) young astronomer Eddington said that he would
 attempt to measure this bending.

   At the next available solar eclipse, Eddington made his measurements for the
 position of a star that he had previously selected as a good candidate.  And,
 he obtained the shift in the star's apparent position in complete agreement
 with Einstein's prediction.  Later people have commented that the errors of
 Eddington's technique were greater than the effect he was attempting to
 measure, but we will not dwell on this.

   A newspaper reporter went to Einstein with the news that Eddington had
 confirmed one of the predictions from his latest theory.

 "Were you worried?" the reporter asked.
 "No." answered Albert.
 "But what if Eddington had not measured the effect you predicted?"
 "Then he would have been wrong." replied Albert.

-- 

                                    Patrick Wyant
                                    AT&T Bell Laboratories (Naperville, IL)
                                    *!ihuxm!gjphw