[net.physics] Re floating battleships in teaspoons

anand@utastro.UUCP (Anand Sivaramakrishnan) (12/13/84)

All this talk about battleships seems to have confused
the issue a bit. I find Archimedes' principle best understood
if one throws the battleship out but retains the bath water...

Think of a closed surface enclosing some water. The enclosed
water has a certain weight, W (a vector pointing downwards).
Now integrate the hydrostatic pressure over the surface
surrounding this bit of water. What must the answer be?
Since the water isn't flowing anywhere, the result of the
integration is a vector of magnitude W, pointing straight up.

Obviously the pressure at any point on this surface is not
dependent on the shape of the container (as long as it is
larger than the surface of interest), so we can discard as much
of the surrounding water as we wish without affecting the value
of the pressure integral. As a matter of fact, we can discard
the complement of the smallest open set of water that includes
the surface, if one is allowed mathematical water.

Furthermore, this pressure integral does not depend on the
nature of the substance within the enclosed surface, so we
can replace the enclosed bit of water with shoes, sealing wax,
cabbages or kings.

Please note that the above discussion does not involve ships
of any sort.