[net.physics] Gamma rays, etc.

jheimann@BBNCCY.ARPA (06/18/85)

From:  John H. Heimann <jheimann@BBNCCY.ARPA>

	Since we've been talking about cosmic rays and gamma rays, I thought it
might be worth pointing out that although photons of particularly high
frequency (and therefore energy) are refered to as gamma rays, and those of
somewhat lower frequency X-rays, and lower still ultraviolet, etc., the
distinctions between types of photons are not well defined in the sense that
they aren't based on any intrinsic properties of the photons.  After all, a
photon is just a photon, and a gamma ray differs from a microwave photon only
in its frequency (and hence energy, wavelength, and momentum).  The
distinctions between gamma rays, X-rays, UV, etc. were made on the basis of how
the photons were produced, since the people who discovered the particles didn't
at first realize that they were photons.  For example, gamma rays were those
photons produced by nuclear decay, and X-rays those produced by bombarding
metal with accelerated electrons, despite the fact that low energy gamma rays
and high energy X-rays of the same frequency are physically identical.  

							John