[net.physics] Lightning Protection

hull@hao.UUCP (Howard Hull) (08/01/85)

Protecting one building or tower from lightning is fairly straightforward:

	1. First order protection -

	   On the tallest object associated with your structure, mount an
	   extended umbrella-like fixture a few meters in diameter,
	   with numerous sharp points along the periphery and across the
	   crown, spaced about 1 meter apart.  (You can make the thing
	   from re-bar and heavy duty chicken wire unless you have high
	   winds like we have around here.)  Use a large diameter conductor
	   (1 to 2 cm.) to connect the umbrella points together at the
	   center and thence down to a suitable ground stake located at
	   a place where soil moisture is prevalent, but more importantly,
	   try to make the conductor run in a straight line with *no* sharp
	   corners; use a minimum radius of 1.5 meters on any bends in the
	   ground wire.  Keep this wire at least 2 meters from any power or
	   communications conduit at all places along its route.
	   Theory:
	   The multitude of points will emit a trickle corona continuously,
	   resulting in a space charge of ionized air within 20 meters of
	   the umbrella.  The space charge will terminate the cloud-to-ground
	   electric field across a broad hemisphere and will reduce the local
	   field gradient to a value below that needed to form "leaders".
	   The umbrella will likely not ever be hit by lightning; however,
	   the conductor gauge is set to minimize the damage inherent in
	   such a strike.  (A strike, if it occurs, will likely be a
	   secondary, (resulting from the shift in electrostatic field just
	   after a strike) to another object within a fraction of a km.)
	   This approach, you should note, puts additional stress on your
	   neighbors (they will see a slight rise in their hit statistics)
	   as it only postpones the discharge until the cloud has moved
	   past your installation.  The ground conductor is spaced from
	   other conduits so that the Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) associated
	   with the 10000 Ampere surge will not be able to develop equivalent
	   currents in parallel conductors adjacent to the ground wire.
	   Using a large diameter and avoiding bends reduces the per length
	   inductance discontinuities.  This discourages the abandonment of
	   your ground conductor in favor of nearby metal objects such as
	   power conduits (resulting in hazardous elevation of the system
	   ground potential to thousands of volts above the mains).
	2. Second order protection -
	   Protect your primary power entry by use of a surge protector
	   having four main elements a.) Line fuses for each hot main NO
	   FUSE FOR THE WHITE NEUTRAL.  No circuit breakers (too slow).
	   b.) Self extinguishing gas discharge tubes or arc chutes routed
	   to a primary ground stake *separated* by 3 or more meters from the
	   umbrella ground mentioned above, *not* using the same stake, even,
	   and using the same linear routing algorithm mentioned above.
	   c.) Heavy gauge inductors, 1 microhenry or thereabouts for typical
	   30 to 50 Ampere per phase service levels, to choke the surge out
	   of the consumer side of the system.  NONE IN THE WHITE NEUTRAL.
	   d.) Post choke line clamping to WHITE NEUTRAL.  This is where the
	   witchcraft comes in.  One candidate is the Metal Oxide Varistor
	   (MOV).  They have two disadvantages: They age, gradually reducing
	   their threshold over time until one day they evaporate in a ball
	   of fire during a line surge.  They have a rather remote threshold
	   characteristic compared to, say, a Silicon TransZorb.  They have
	   several advantages: They are cheap.  They come in packaging that
	   is familiar to professional electricians.  They are generally
	   more robust than Selenium or Silicon protectors.  They have a
	   smaller geometry than a Selenium protector.  Another candidate
	   is a combination protector made up from a ground referenced
	   50 Ampere triac in series with either a lower rated voltage
	   MOV or TransZorb element, with the triac gate wired back to (an
	   artfully positioned) tap on the gas tube/arc chute ground.  From
	   here (this stuff belongs in a fire-rated NEMA box) the WHITE
	   NEUTRAL and GREEN NEUTRAL are tied together at this one point
	   only, and passed through a medium size conductor to the primary
	   ground stake by a route that is separated by 1.5 meters from
	   the gas tube/arc chute ground.
	   Theory:
	   If your power line gets hit, the gas tube fires and conducts the
	   surge current to ground.  The 20 kilovolts experienced by your
	   service entry (for about 10 microseconds) will go through the
	   chokes and will cause the MOV or complex protector shunt to break
	   down and draw a steadily rising current (to many tens of Amperes),
	   but immediately choked to a reduced voltage.  The fuses will, after
	   a while, be blown away.  Until then, the MOVs will clamp the
	   WHITE NEUTRAL to the mains (perhaps resulting in noticeable
	   rise of the common-mode voltage).  It is this common-mode elevation
	   which destroys your out-of-building communications interfaces.
	   With everything in the building coming to 2000 volts above your
	   neighbors (including your local telephone operating company),
	   any common-mode paths will be severely stressed.  However,
	   especially withing the building, they will be less stressed than
	   they would have been if the mains were allowed to diverge from
	   the WHITE NEUTRAL.
	3. Third level protection
	   The most effective common-mode protection is an Ultra-Isolator
	   Transformer.  It is also rather expensive compared to differential
	   line protectors and secondary Silicon TransZorb protectors.
	   Although many Ultra-Isolator Transformers were utilized during
	   the 1970's by sensitive computer installations, it was realized
	   eventually that the most damage to main-frame equipment was done
	   by differential surges (main to main on three-phase systems).
	   The common-mode threat was seen as too little to justify the
	   cost and complexity of installation of an ultra-isolator, which,
	   by the way, can also be done ineffectively, resulting in no net
	   improvement in the level of protection.  The companies that
	   make ultra-isolators issue complete and effective instructions
	   concerning their installation.  The difficulty is in getting
	   industrial electricians to follow the directions.
	   Thus for the benefit of the main-frame and peripheral power
	   supplies, for cost effective purposes, a good differential
	   surge eliminator inside the enclosure of each system power
	   supply is recommended.  However, remember that the common mode
	   is the most destructive to your distributed data communications
	   peripherals; unfortunately, to protect them you must provide
	   the entire computer room and distributed CRT terminal load with
	   an ultra-isolator transformer, or see that each unit is designed
	   to withstand momentary local and global differences of thousands
	   of volts on the signal returns.  Even then, on occasion, only one
	   violator located in a critical location and tied to a non-isolated
	   power system elsewhere in the building can blow the whole scheme.
	   Theory:
	   Not much theory here.  The entire primary winding of the transformer
	   may get lifted to 2000 volts, but the secondary remains referenced
	   to the computer room ground stake.  The box shields around the the
	   windings are tied to the stake, and short out the electric field
	   that might otherwise couple to the secondary.  Saturation of the
	   transformer core protects the differential mode.  The differential
	   protectors installed in each power supply dissipate the surges
	   locally and since each takes a small part of the surge energy, no
	   concentration of damage will likely occur.
	4. Fourth order protection
	   You may get surge protectors for all communication lines leaving
	   the building.  Each will need a reliable path to a stout ground.
	   (DEC usually specifies that the computer frame GREEN WIRE ground
	   be done with a heavy gauge wire, and all surge protector grounds
	   be separately returned to the distribution transformer secondary
	   neutral grounding point.) You may add Silicon TransZorbs to power
	   supply rails in data communications equipment.
	   Theory:
	   If one of your comm lines gets hit, or gets involved in an induced
	   surge, the elevation in voltage not dissipated by the protector is
	   conducted through the internal diode clamps included in most IC
	   line drivers and receivers to a ground or supply rail, and thence
	   to a TransZorb (a back-to-back zener with a heavy silver anode and
	   thermally conductive silver leads).  If enough protectors are in
	   place, the common-mode surge is clubbed to death by the collective
	   capability of all peripheral surge protectors operating together.

And that about does it.  Needless to say, if you do a good job of protecting
your site, and one of your neighbors gets hit, you may be damaged anyhow by
currents resulting from the elevation of your neighbor's electrical ground.
This is especially true in Hawaii (and even more so on their mountain tops)
where the ground is made of lava rock.  If you get hit by lightning, your
entire site goes to 25000 volts with respect to the surrounding neighborhood.
This bleeds down to appx 2000 volts over the next 100 microseconds or so.

If you have several buildings to worry about, such as may be the case for a
university campus, putting an umbrella protector on every building will only
cause the cloud to ground potential to develop to the point that when you
finally do get a strike, it will be a *real killer*.  It has been pointed
out elsewhere that most lightning strikes are from the ground up to the cloud.
Thus, More Theory (speculation):
I suspect that the mechanism is something like this:  Collisions of air
molecules with each other and the things that make up the surface tend to
knock electrons off the air molecules.  There are other charge pair generation
mechanisms as well, such as natural radioactive decay of Radon 222 and its
decay products.  (This specific mechanism is not my theory - see JGR Vol 90
No D4 Pgs 5909-5916 June 30, 1985, Edward A Martell, NCAR.)  The electrons,
because of their charge, are sticky.  They cling to the surfaces of various
semi-insulators (rocks and dry dirt) and near the surface of conductors until
enough of them are implanted to provide a counter electrical field gradient to
repel later arrivals.  The positive air ions are separated by thermal energy,
and molecular screening prevents the immediate recombination.  The charge
separation is effected by the rising of the warmed positively ionized air.

Once the charge is separated, mutual repulsion drives the electrons into the
conductive ground layers.  Later, as the air rises and water condenses,
positively charged droplets accumulate in descending air columns at the front
of the storm just ahead of the rising column.  A field gradient is thus
established with respect to the ground, where all the electrons are.  As the
ground is conductive, the electrons follow the cloud until, with the aid of
conductive moisture and the turbulence of the rising and descending air column
interface, leaders are established and a strike path is ionized and carried
into the descending air.  The electrons travel up the path in a flash (parts
of which will have oscillations at radio frequency) and then distribute
themselves (at a more leisurely pace, accompanied with local flashes and
secondary flashes) in accordance with upper level gradients until there is
nolonger sufficient gradient to ionize the cloud-to-cloud paths.  Time scales:

 Main strike and individual secondary strikes each about 10 microseconds.
 Duration of ionized path, reversals and secondaries about 100 microseconds.
 Duration of high altitude electrical coronae readjustment about 1 millisecond.

Localized differences in the final potential may result in some reverse
strikes from a few overcharged negative clouds to the ground, or subsequently
more numerously (after air motion), cloud to cloud "readjustments".

Well, I've done it again.  Darn.  If this is too long, I suppose you should
flame me for it, or if I am guilty of mis-representing known (un)truths, that
would qualify as well.  But I wanted to at least try to clear up the nature
of lightning and its hazards a little.
								     Howard Hull
[If yet unproven concepts are outlawed in the range of discussion...
                   ...Then only the deranged will discuss yet unproven concepts]
        {ucbvax!hplabs | allegra!nbires | harpo!seismo } !hao!hull