piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (07/31/85)
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 1985 1:48 PM EDT Msg: UGIF-2031-7612 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW CC: RPark Subj: What's New WHAT'S NEW, Friday, July 12, 1985 Washington, D.C. 1. WHEN DOES CONGRESS'S PORK MEAN FAT FOR ACADEME? The answer: When the "spoils system," part of the nation's political heritage that goes back to Andrew Jackson's presidency, works wonders, unimpeded by hearings, debates and markups. This year, despite demands for fiscal restraints, Congress is dipping into the pork barrel for some good ol' (and some not so ol') universities. So, during a reading of the $13 billion supplemental spending bill for fiscal 1985, senators inserted amendments for an energy research center at the University of Utah ($2 million) and additions to the Dartmouth engineering school ($15 million). More handouts appeared in the House Appropriations Committee's report on the energy and water development bill for fiscal 1986. Among these: a science and technology center for Atlanta University ($6 million), Florida State's supercomputer institute (another $8.5 million), Columbia U's chemistry building (another $12 million), an energy and mineral research center at the University of Alabama ($8 million) and a Demonstration Center for Information Technologies at Brown University ($5 million)--all to come from the Energy Department's Basic Energy Sciences program. If the bill passes unchanged, DoE also will provide $6 million for proposals for a 6-GeV synchrotron light source (highest priority of last year's Seitz-Eastman report on materials sciences), restore $10 million to the proposed $25.5 million cut in high-energy physics and add $4 million to Argonne's 1986 budget for materials sciences and energy chemistry. But DoE also suffers large reductions: $8 million from the requested $17.4 million for Lawrence Berkeley's Center for Advanced Materials and another $5 million whack from magnetic fusion projects. 2. EUREKA, FRANCE'S RESPONSE TO "STAR WARS," got an important boost on 26 June when four leading Western European electronics companies agreed to collaborate. The four--GEC (Britain), Philips (Nether- lands), Siemens (West Germany) and Thomson (France)--will work on advanced microprocessors and gallium arsenide integrated circuits. The agreement, announced on the eve of the EEC summit in Milan, was cheered by France's President Mitterrand, who launched Eureka in April in reaction to Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative. Mitterrand argues that SDI provides a pretext for the US government to throw $26 billion at US firms for high-tech R&D over the next five years, thereby lessening chances for European companies in such fields as optics, advanced materials, micro-electronics, computers, lasers and artificial intelligence. The reaction to SDI is not surprising, considering that France developed nuclear weapons on its own, after being shut out of postwar work by the US and Britain. With Eureka, Mitterrand believes Europe will advance in high-tech manufacturing on its own, without any spinoffs of SDI. But the lure of Pentagon funds is attractive. One French company, REOSC, has a $900,000 contract from SDI for a 1.85-meter mirror to reflect laser beams in space. Other firms--Messerschmitt in West Germany, Selenia in Italy, and British Aerospace--are negotiating with SDI. Robert L. Park American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 7/12/85
piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (08/01/85)
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 1985 12:51 PM EDT Msg: OGIF-2036-3540 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW CC: RPark Subj: What's New WHAT'S NEW, Friday, July 19, 1985 Washington, D.C. 1. THE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FACILITIES REVITALIZATION ACT of 1985 (H.R. 2823) introduced by Representative Don Fuqua (D-FL), chairman of the House Committee on Science and Technology, would authorize the creation of university and college research laboratory modernization programs in the major federal R&D agencies. The federal share of the 10 year program would be about $5 billion, which is expected to leverage another $5 billion in non-federal funds, but would be indexed to the annual level of federally supported R&D performed at univer- sities and colleges. The bill contains a critical provision to protect the base of university R&D funding so that laboratory modernization would not be an undue tax on funding for research grants. This provision prevents the facility programs, once established, from growing any faster than the R&D base during years of increased R&D funding. It also provides that in a year in which R&D funding is cut 10% or more, the program would drop to zero. Modernization funds will go to smaller institu- tions at least in proportion to their share of other research funds. Much of the stimulation for the current legislation results from the controversy over pork barrel funding of science facilities which in recent years has threatened the entire system of merit-based support for science. 2. THE CUBAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY invited three Americans to speak at their third symposium in Santiago June 27-29. The symposium attracted more than 100 papers by Cuban authors. The Cuban economy is in serious difficulty as a result of the economic blockade by the United States and the low price of sugar on the world market. These economic difficulties are clearly hampering their attempts to improve science and move into high technology. The government urges an emphasis on experimental physics to benefit their technological development, but in view of the extreme shortage of research facilities and equipment, they could perhaps make a greater contribution in theory. In addition to research equipment, they have serious deficiencies in their libraries and they are anxious to have American physicists, particularly in areas related to solid state electronics, visit Cuba and lecture on recent developments. They would also like to send some of their better physics students to the United States for further study. According to Congressman George Brown (D-CA), who traveled to Cuba with Representative Don Ritter (R-PA) at about the same time, even the Russians would welcome a normalization of Cuban-U.S. relations. The Soviets are awash with sugar obtained from Cuba as payment on their debt, but are seriously short of hard currency. A current joke in Moscow is of a Russian who returns from a visit to the United States. When asked what things were like he replies, "It is just like here, you can buy nothing with rubles and anything you want with dollars." Robert L. Park American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 7/19/85
piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (08/03/85)
Posted: Fri Aug 2, 1985 4:11 PM EDT Msg: IGIF-2044-5806 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW CC: RPark Subj: What's New WHAT'S NEW, Friday, August 2, 1985 Washington, D.C. 1. WHAT DOES CONGRESS'S BOTTOM-LINE AGREEMENT ON THE 1986 BUDGET MEAN FOR SCIENCE? If appropriations bills and floor debates suggest things to come, science will fare exceedingly well considering the worries in Washington about deficit reduction, despite some aberrations. There was a flurry of excitement in the House on 25 July over increases to Reagan Administration requests for the National Science Foundation and NASA. Representative Paul Henry of Michigan argued for freezing the budgets of both agencies at 1985 levels. But impassioned pleas by a bipartisan group of House members, led by Florida's Don Fuqua, Ohio's Mary Rose Oakar and California's Ron Packard and Jerry Lewis, enabled the House to defeat Henry's amendments by a lopsided 300 to 112 vote. The House would add $40 million more to NSF research and $56 million for NASA than the Administration wants--though NSF's Very Long Base-line Array radiotelescope would be capped at $8 million, which is $3 million less than requested, and NSF's science education program would get $10 million more than the original $50 million item. All this will have to be agreed upon in conference with the Senate when Congress reassembles in September. Meanwhile, the Energy Department's budget, which the House approved weeks ago with pork-barrel additions (see What's New, 12 July), sailed through the Senate with a few exceptions--most notably, the Senate didn't honor the House's $5 million gift to Brown University for an information technology center. But Senators liked the House idea to initiate competitive bidding for a 6-GeV synchrotron light source and to pump money into a struggling Argonne. 2. THE ACADEMIC SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER HOLDOUTS, the University of Illinois and Cornell University, have finally signed contracts with the National Science Foundation that in their opinion offer no threat to academic freedom. As we have previously reported, contracts to operate supercomputer centers at the University of California, San Diego and at Princeton University, commit those centers to abide by whatever policy is currently being developed by the Senior Interagency Group on Technology Transfer (see What's New, June 21, 1985). That policy could, if it takes on the force of law, compel Illinois and Cornell to renegotiate their contracts. Officials at both institutions have acknowledged the possibility that it might result in closing the centers they have agreed to operate if the principle of academic freedom would be violated. A particularly disturbing aspect of this controversy is that government efforts to control access to supercomputers did not begin until the decision was made to locate supercomputers at universities. Private companies have been leasing time on supercomputers without restriction to anyone who will pay the fee. Robert L. Park American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 8/2/85
piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (08/10/85)
Posted: Fri Aug 9, 1985 3:21 PM EDT Msg: SGIF-2048-8200 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW CC: RPark Subj: What's new WHAT'S NEW, Friday, August 9, 1985 Washington, D.C. 1. UNIVERSITIES RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., which manages Fermilab and R&D and conceptual design for the SSC, has announced the resignation of Guy Stever as president. URI is a consortium of 56 US and Canadian universities engaged in high energy physics. Stever, a former director of the National Science Foundation, will be replaced by another former director, Ed Knapp. 2. CONGRESS IS IN RECESS until September 4 in their annual exodus to avoid Washington's notorious August weather. Washington doesn't quite come to a stop in their absence, but it certainly slows down. There are, however, plenty of unresolved issues for Congress to take up when it returns. 3. A PERMANENT EXCLUSION OF EMPLOYER-PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE from gross income would be provided by bills now before the Senate (S. 558) and House (H.R. 1356). Such an exemption is currently provided by Section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code which will soon expire without Congressional action. A permanent exclusion is included in the President's proposed tax reform plan in keeping with the recommendation of the President's Commission on Industrial Competitiveness "that our tax code not further bias employers against funding employee training." Such an exclusion is regarded by many as essential in the rapidly changing environment of high technology industry. 4. THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE HOLDING SECURITY CLEARANCES is to be reduced by 10% as a result of the recent spy scandals. This will affect about 130,000 defense contractor employees and is expected to result in a sizable number of layoffs. It is also expected to result in an expanded use of the polygraph in the screening of applicants for jobs on classified projects. Those favoring expanded use of the polygraph appeared to be supported by reports that the CIA employee charged recently with disclosing the names of CIA informants in Ghana was investigated after she failed a routine polygraph examination. In fact, Representative Don Edwards (D-CA), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, notes that the CIA station chief in Ghana ordered the employee to terminiate her relationship with a Ghanaian more than a year before the test was administered. It has been argued that the successes claimed for the polygraph usually occur when the examiner has independent knowledge of evasion. Robert L. Park American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 8/9/85
piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (08/19/85)
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 1985 4:37 PM EDT Msg: PGIF-2053-2805 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW CC: RPark Subj: What's New WHAT'S NEW, Friday, August 16, 1985 Washington, D.C. 1. CLOSED SESSIONS AT TECHNICAL MEETINGS, that is, sessions for U. S. citizens only, continue to be scheduled by the Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering. Such sessions are planned for their l8th International Technical Conference, to be held in Seattle in October, entitled "Materials for Space--the Gathering Momentum," and also for their l7th International Technical Conference, entitled "Overcoming Material Boundaries," to be held at Kiamesha Lake, New York, also in October. Most of the closed sessions will deal with metal matrix composites, as they have in the past. Meanwhile, the DoD, which prefers the euphemistic term, "export controlled sessions," has been working on a statement of policy and guidelines for the presentation of DoD-sponsored scientific and technical papers. The stated purpose is to establish policy for the dissemination of scientific and technical information in the possession or under the control of the DoD. A number of societies, including The American Physical Society, have firm policies barring any participation in conferences that place restraints on communication of unclassified scientific information. 2. THE OFFICE OF INNOVATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, of the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, has been having its own trouble with the issue of freedom of scientific communication. Although IST Director Jim Ionson has insisted from the beginning that there would be no restrictions on the dissemination of research results or of participation of non-US citizens for on-campus research sponsored by IST, the funds all come from the DoD 6.3 category, which is designated for development. As such, it falls outside the DoD policy guaranteeing openness in fundamental research conducted on campus for the DoD. Apparently, not everyone at SDIO was aware of Ionson's policy, and universities have received mixed signals concerning their responsibilities in obtaining clearance for contacts with the press or the release of technical papers. At an urgent meeting last Friday, DoD officials drafted a letter from Ionson to military procurement officers, instructing them that 6.3a research ("a" denotes SDI) in universities will be treated as 6.1, which is the designation for basic research. An intemperate memo from the commander of an Army Corps of Engineers' laboratory at the University of Illinois, calling for an end to all contacts with university researchers who had signed an anti-SDI petition, contributed to the atmosphere of confrontation. The memorandum was later withdrawn with an apology. Robert L. Park American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 8/16/85