dgary@ecsvax.UUCP (D Gary Grady) (08/20/85)
The 1985 August 3 issue of Science News has an article by D E Thompson on cosmology that offers an interesting time frame from Frank Tippler at Tulane. Everyone has seen a sceneario for the Big Bang, but have you seen one for the end of the universe? The article projects what will happen in a Big Crunch (assuming a closed universe), but that is less interesting than the following future history for a flat or open universe (the open and "flat" -neither close nor open- scenarios are very similar, except that in the open there are some positrons and electrons left around at the end). The numbers on the left are years from today in Fortran notation (1E9 means 1 times 10 to the 9th). 1E9 Sun leaves main sequence (big news all over galaxy :=) 1E12 New stars cease to form 1E15 All stars burned out 1E34 All planets and stars gone due to proton decay 1E54 Black holes of solar mass or smaller gone due to Hawking radiation 1E71 Positronium (paired electrons/positrons) most common "atom" 1E98 My August monthly report finished 1E102 All black holes, even those with mass of a supercluster of galaxies, lost to Hawking radiation 1E128 Only dim energy left This should appeal to fans of Olaf Stapledon. I note that in any of the scenarios described (flat, open, or closed) the Universe ends with a bang or a whimper, but it does end, and there is no serious prospect for the survival of matter. This clearly has negative implications for the longterm performance of most stocks. -- D Gary Grady Duke U Comp Center, Durham, NC 27706 (919) 684-3695 USENET: {seismo,decvax,ihnp4,akgua,etc.}!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary
dgary@ecsvax.UUCP (D Gary Grady) (08/20/85)
The 1985 August 3 issue of Science News has an article by D E Thompson on cosmology that offers an interesting time line from Frank Tippler at Tulane. Everyone has seen a scenario for the Big Bang, but have you seen one for the end of the universe? Tippler projects what will happen in a Big Crunch (assuming a closed universe), but that is less interesting than the following future history for a flat or open universe (the open and "flat" -neither close nor open- scenarios are very similar, except that in the open there are some positrons and electrons left around at the end). The numbers on the left are years from today in Fortran notation (1E9 means 1 times 10 to the 9th). 1E9 Sun leaves main sequence (big news all over galaxy :=) 1E12 New stars cease to form 1E15 All stars burned out 1E34 All planets and stars gone due to proton decay 1E54 Black holes of solar mass or smaller gone due to Hawking radiation 1E71 Positronium (paired electrons/positrons) most common "atom" 1E98 My August monthly report finished 1E102 All black holes, even those with mass of a supercluster of galaxies, lost to Hawking radiation 1E128 Only dim energy left This should appeal to fans of Olaf Stapledon. I note that in any of the scenarios described (flat, open, or closed) the Universe ends with a bang or a whimper, but it does end, and there is no serious prospect for the survival of matter. This clearly has negative implications for the longterm performance of most stocks. -- D Gary Grady Duke U Comp Center, Durham, NC 27706 (919) 684-3695 USENET: {seismo,decvax,ihnp4,akgua,etc.}!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary -- D Gary Grady Duke U Comp Center, Durham, NC 27706 (919) 684-3695 USENET: {seismo,decvax,ihnp4,akgua,etc.}!mcnc!ecsvax!dgary
flink@umcp-cs.UUCP (Paul V. Torek) (08/23/85)
In article <281@ecsvax.UUCP> dgary@ecsvax.UUCP (D Gary Grady) writes: >This should appeal to fans of Olaf Stapledon. I note that in any of the >scenarios described (flat, open, or closed) the Universe ends with a >bang or a whimper, but it does end, and there is no serious prospect for >the survival of matter. This clearly has negative implications for the >longterm performance of most stocks. Another interesting twist, however, can be found in a 198(4?) *Science* article with a title including the word "Entropy" (so you can look it up in the Reader's Guide to Periodicals). It seems that in a "critical" (what D Gary Grady calls a "flat") universe, if black holes form not only on a galactic cluster level but on ever-larger scales, there could be no limit to the increase of entropy in the universe. That is, infinity / | dS/dt = infinity. / t = now Freeman Dyson says that the correctness of the above equation is the only precondition for the never-ending continuation of life in the universe; given a "sufficiently resourceful intelligence". Civilization woould live off the Hawking radiation emitted from black holes. Unfortunately, the author of the *Science* article points out, life forms based on our sort of matter could not pull this trick. However, radically different life forms might: the author suggests that life based on electron-positron plasma -- if such "life" might be possible -- could endure. The author wisely doesn't attempt to grapple with the obvious philosophical issues about the definition of life, etc., and neither, at this moment, will I. --Paul V Torek, umcp-cs!flink