[net.physics] "What's New" 10/11/85

piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (11/15/85)

Posted: Fri  Oct 11, 1985   4:21 PM EDT              Msg: CGIF-2089-5346
From:   RPARK
To:     WHATSNEW
CC:     RPark
Subj:   What's new

         WHAT'S NEW, Friday, October 11, 1985        Washington, D.C.
         
         
         1.   NATIONAL POLICY ON THE TRANSFER OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL 
         AND ENGINEERING INFORMATION (National Security Decision 
         Directive 189) seeks to control the flow of information 
         produced under federally funded fundamental research at 
         colleges, universities and laboratories.  Fundamental 
         research is defined in the Directive as follows: 
         
              "Fundamental research" means basic and applied 
              research in science and engineering, the results of 
              which ordinarily are published and shared broadly 
              within the scientific community, as distinguished 
              from proprietary research and from industrial 
              development, design, production, and product 
              utilization, the results of which ordinarily are 
              restricted for proprietary or national security 
              reasons. 
         
         The policy portion of the Directive was published in What's 
         New Oct. 4, l985.  The policy statement was generally 
         applauded by the scientific community as marking the end of 
         attempts to control the dissemination of "sensitive" but 
         unclassified information.  The covering memorandum to agency 
         heads, however, signed by Robert McFarlane, National Security 
         Adviser to the President, pointedly reminds the agencies that 
         the Directive preserves the ability to control unclassified 
         information using legislated authority.  This is presumably a 
         reference to the Export Administration Act of 1985, signed 
         into law by the President in July.  McFarlane seems to be 
         telling the agencies that they can proceed as before.
         
         2.  THE MILITARIZATION OF NASA has been successfully resisted 
         since the agency was founded in the aftermath of Sputnik.  
         Concerns have been raised again with the nomination of 
         William R. Graham to be Deputy Administrator, replacing Hans 
         Mark, who resigned to become Chancellor of the University of 
         Texas system.  Mr. Graham, a California Republican with a 
         Ph D in electrical engineering from Stanford, currently 
         serves as Chairman of the President's General Advisory 
         Committee on Arms Control and Disarmament.  He is also a 
         founder and Senior Associate of R & D Associates, a Marina 
         Del Rey firm closely linked to the Pentagon.  He is generally 
         regarded as a right-wing ideologue, and his nomination has 
         been greeted with a singular lack of enthusiam in NASA.  
         Confirmation hearings on Thursday were sparsely attended as a 
         result of the debt ceiling debate, but Senator Ernest 
         Hollings (D-SC) sent one of six written questions to Graham, 
         "Could you please allay any fears I or other members might 
         have that your appointment represents the militarization of 
         NASA."
         
         Robert L. Park
         American Physical Society                THAT'S ALL 10/11/85