[net.physics] "What's New" 11/01/85

piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (11/15/85)

Posted: Fri  Nov  1, 1985   4:14 PM EST              Msg: GGIF-2105-1496
From:   RPARK
To:     WHATSNEW
CC:     RPark
Subj:   What's New

         WHAT'S NEW, Friday, November 1, 1985       Washington, D.C.
         
         1.  NO DECISION ON THE SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER BEFORE 
         MID-1987.  That's what Alvin Trivelpiece, the Energy 
         Department's head of scientific research, told members of 
         Congress on October 29.  "It's no secret that the SSC is not 
         in our budget for fiscal 1987," he said.  "The earliest it 
         could appear is in fiscal 1988, and an object of such cost 
         and scope would need the President's approval."  The real 
         reason for the special hearing that led to Trivelpiece's 
         candor--and brought Herwig Schopper and Carlo Rubbia from 
         CERN to testify about Europe's plans in high-energy 
         physics--centered on the selection of high-field 
         (6 tesla) superconducting magnets for the machine.  The 
         choice upset scientists and engineers at the Texas 
         Accelerator Center, where work had progressed on low-field 
         superferric magnets (3 tesla).  The high-field magnet type 
         means a smaller ring and, hence, a tunnel a mere 60 miles in 
         circumference.  Texas Congressman Joe Barton, primed with 
         questions by his constituents, wanted to know why the magnet 
         selection panel based their cost calculations for the tunnel 
         at $930 per linear foot (which led to an $83 million 
         advantage for the high-field type), while tunnelers in his 
         state priced work at $350 to $500 per linear foot (which 
         would give the superferric design a decisive advantage).  
         Both Frank Sciulli of Columbia, who headed the magnet panel, 
         and Maury Tigner of Cornell, who leads the SSC Central Design 
         Group, stuck by their choice as the most reliable and 
         cost-effective type.  Even so, the dust-up over costs and 
         decisions left some scars on the proposed project.
         
         2.  THE 1985 ENRICO FERMI AWARD RECIPIENTS are Norman 
         Rasmussen of MIT and Marshall Rosenbluth of the University of 
         Texas.  The Fermi Award is the highest scientific award given 
         by the United States Department of Energy.  Rasmussen is 
         recognized for his development of risk-assessment techniques 
         in nuclear power plant safety.  Rosenbluth, who is considered 
         by many to be the leading plasma theorist, has significantly 
         advanced the understanding of magnetic confinement for 
         controlled thermonuclear fusion.  
         
         3.  THE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVE OF THE DOD was set at 
         $75 million by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on 
         Defense.  An attempt by Senator D'Amato (R-NY) to earmark 
         nearly $30 million of the URI funds for a computer research 
         program at Syracuse University failed following an urgent 
         lobbying effort by the Association of American Universities, 
         which has consistently opposed such pork barrel funding of 
         research.  The American Physical Society also strongly 
         opposes such end runs on the normal process of proposal 
         submission and review.
         
         Robert L. Park (202) 429-1946
         American Physical Society                THAT'S ALL 11/1/85