[net.physics] "What's New" 12/27/85

piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (01/08/86)

Posted: Fri  Dec 27, 1985   4:38 PM EST              Msg: KGIF-2145-3006
From:   RPARK
To:     WHATSNEW
Subj:   WHAT'S NEW, December 27, 1985     Washington, D.C. 

        1.  SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING MANPOWER TRENDS for the 
        remainder of this century are explored in a technical 
        memorandum issued by the Office of Technology Assessment at the 
        request of the Science Policy Task Force of the House Committee 
        on Science and Technology.  A projected decline of 22% in the 
        college-age population in the next decade has led to concern 
        about the supply of scientists and engineers.  Moreover, an 
        increasing fraction of the college-age population will be black 
        or Hispanic, groups that have historically shied away from 
        science and engineering.  Increased participation by women 
        could easily compensate for demographic changes, but women are 
        discouraged by gender-stereotyped career expectations and 
        unequal treatment of women in the scientific and engineering 
        work force.  According to the study, they are still at a 
        considerable disadvantage with respect to salary and promotion.  
        The study cautions that demographic trends are not necessarily 
        translated into manpower shortages.  Market forces in the form 
        of salaries and opportunities tend to overwhelm demographics.  
        In the mid-sixties, the Manpower Mobilization Board was 
        pressuring universities to increase the production rate of PhD 
        scientists in anticipation of severe shortages by 1970, which 
        turned out in fact to be serious surpluses.  Apparently mindful 
        of this history, the report concludes that the government's 
        role in alleviating shortages of scientists and engineers is 
        limited. (#052-003-01014-3, $6, OTA, 600 Pa Ave SE, DC 20510)
        
        2.  CIRCULAR A-21, the Office of Management and Budget rules 
        for determining the indirect cost recovery by universities on 
        federal grants, is being revised along the lines of a recent 
        recommendation by OSTP, (What's New, November 29).  The good 
        news is that the onerous requirement for effort reporting by 
        faculty members will be dropped from the new version.  Also 
        missing will be the requirement for documentation of mandatory 
        cost-sharing.  The elimination of the controversial effort 
        reporting requirement appears to be sweetening to cover the 
        bitter taste of a provision that would fix the rate for 
        administrative cost pools at a single fixed percent of modified 
        total direct costs common to all universities.  According to 
        recently departed Science Advisor to the President, George 
        Keyworth, this would "alleviate the primary source of acrimony 
        and suspicion between university administrators, their faculty 
        and the federal government."  Since a national average will be 
        used to determine the level of administrative costs, the 
        provision should have zero impact on the budget.  For this 
        reason, administration officials believe that A-21 can be 
        changed by OMB without going to Congress.  
        
                         BEST WISHES FOR THE NEW YEAR!
        
        Robert L. Park (202) 429-1946
        American Physical Society                THAT'S ALL 12/27/85