[net.physics] "What's New" 01/24/86

piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (01/25/86)

Posted: Thu  Jan 23, 1986   3:50 PM EST              Msg: QGIG-2164-1856
From:   RPARK
To:     WHATSNEW
Subj:    What's New, 24 January 1986         Washington, DC

         
         
         1.  THE OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT has been directed by 
         Congress to conduct another study of the Strategic Defense 
         Initiative.  $700,000 is provided by the Defense 
         Appropriations Bill for a comprehensive, classified study due 
         30 Aug 87.  The study is intended to "determine the technical 
         feasibility and implications [of SDI] and the ability to 
         survive and function despite a preemptive attack by an 
         aggressor possessing comparable technology. . . ."  What 
         makes the new study surprising is that an earlier study 
         released in September was not popular with some members of 
         Congress and the twelve member Congressional board that 
         oversees OTA decided to release the study by a narrow 7-5 
         margin (see WN 27 Sep 85).  Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), 
         who opposed the release of the earlier study, solidly backs 
         the new OTA assignment.  Contributing to the controversy was 
         the resignation of General Daniel Graham, head of High 
         Frontier, from the study's advisory board.  Graham 
         represented his resignation as a protest over the stacking of 
         the study with opponents of SDI, but others insist he was 
         pressured to resign after he repeatedly leaked details of the 
         study while it was in progress.  The new positive attitude 
         toward OTA probably reflects the growing perception that the 
         president's version of SDI is fantasy.
         
         2.  BUDGET CUTS FOR SCIENCE IN FISCAL 1987 have already been 
         by the federal agencies, in keeping with the requirements of 
         the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings budget-balancing act.  So, when 
         President Reagan's budget is submitted in the week of 
         February 3, it will reflect the automatic 4.3% reductions 
         imposed for the current fiscal year by the Office of 
         Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office, 
         along with the additional cuts the Administration has made 
         for FY 87.  This is being done to put the responsibility 
         squarely up to Congress for making any further changes in an 
         election year.  At the White House and OMB the order is out, 
         from the President himself, to protect basic research.  The 
         Strategic Defense Initiative will not suffer any cuts at all 
         in the 87 budget, while construction funds for such 
         scientific projects as completion of Fermilab's Tevatron I 
         and Cornell's upgrade of CESR will be adjusted so these are 
         not prolonged interminably.  But the word is out in 
         Washington that the National Institutes of Health and the 
         Energy Department's fusion program will be hit particularly 
         hard.  NIH will undoubtably find support in Congress to 
         restore some funds, as it has in the past, but political 
         backing for fusion is minimal.  At NSF, assistant directors 
         in the physical sciences grimace about the widespread pain 
         that will be caused by the 87 budget cuts, while officials in 
         the engineering directorates smile benignly. 
         
         Robert L. Park (202) 429-1946
         American Physical Society                THAT'S ALL 1/24/86