piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (02/04/86)
Posted: Mon Feb 3, 1986 8:35 AM EST Msg: CGIG-2171-6898 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW Subj: What's New, Friday, 31 January 1986 Washington, D.C. dh 1. THE CONGRESSIONAL SCIENTISTS FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM of the APS has extended the deadline for receipt of completed applications to 28 Feb 1986. Successful candidates will serve for one year, beginning 1 Sept 1986. In addition to demonstrated competence in physics, candidates are expected to have a strong interest and some experience in applying scientific knowledge toward the solution of social problems. About half of the former APS Fellows have elected to remain in Washington where they help to fill a critical need for people in government with a scientific background. For further information contact: Dr. Mary L. Shoaf, Princeton Plasma Physics Lab., 609/683-2104. 2. THE PACKARD-BROMLEY REPORT on the health of universities and colleges, which carries the optimistic title "A Renewed Partnership," contains a number of recommendations for indirect cost reimbursement that are identical to those made by OSTP in November (see WN 29 Nov 85, 27 Dec 85). Specifically, these recommendations are: 1) to use a fixed rate for administrative cost pools common to all universities, 2) eliminate the requirement for cost sharing, 3) eliminate the requirement for faculty effort reporting and 4) require all agencies to include indirect costs in the budget that is subject to peer review. In addition, the Packard-Bromley report recommends that reimbursement for depreciation of facilities and equipment be based on much shorter useful lifetimes. Sources at OMB confirm that Circular A-21 is being revised to incorporate the OSTP recommendations, but not the shortened depreciation times recommended by Packard-Bromley--that would have had the effect of increasing the cost reimbursement to universities. 3. RESTRICTIVE CLAUSES IN RESEARCH AWARDS have increased in recent years. Concern has centered on clauses restricting the dissemination of the results of the research or barring participation of foreign nationals. There is, however, a curious new clause in DoE grants whose implications are less clear. DoE rules for special research grants specify that they shall never be intentionally used to fund classified activities. However, the new clause states that "if the grantee believes any information developed or acquired may be classifiable, the grantee shall not provide the potentially classifiable information to anyone except the Director of Classification and shall protect such information as if it were classified until notified by DoE that a determination has been made that it does not require such handling." The Special Research Grants Program of the DoE was created out of concern for the effect of Competititon In Contracting legislation (PL 98-72) on unsolicited proposals. Robert L. Park (202) 429-1946 American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 1/31/86