piner@pur-phy.UUCP (Richard Piner) (03/22/86)
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 1986 11:10 AM EST Msg: BGIG-2214-4632 From: RPARK To: WHATSNEW Subj: What's New, Friday 21 March 1986 Washington, DC 1. THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY has not had a budget authorization from the House in years and has learned to like it that way. Because of the new discipline imposed by "Grambo," however, they got an authorization this week that completely dispelled the fantasy of the Reagan asking budget. -- Basic Energy Sciences was reduced $50M below the asking budget, but not before $11M was earmarked by the Subcommittee on Energy Development for Chairman Don Fuqua's pet computer project at Florida State. -- General Science and Research, which includes high energy physics and nuclear physics, was slashed $l40M below the asking budget, a staggering 18%. Specifically, construction funds for CEBAF were cut from $25M to $17M. -- To prevent the SSC from languishing while more and more money is poured into studies, Fuqua introduced language requiring the Secretary of Energy either to make a decision during FY 86 to proceed with construction or to cease all funding for the project in FY 87. Although the authorization is not binding, it is unusual for appropriations to exceed the authorized levels. This is the first real look at the FY 87 chicken entrails. The prognosis is grim. 2. REPRESENTATIVE DON FUQUA (D-FLA), Chairman of the Committee on Science and Technology, announced last week he will not seek reelection at the end of this year. It is rumored that he has been offered a lucrative position in the private sector. The heir apparent is Robert A. Roe (D-NJ), the second-ranking member of the committee. His views on science are a mystery. No one seems to recall having seen him at committee hearings. 3. THE PRESIDENTS OF 27 SCIENTIFIC, ENGINEERING AND MATHEMATICS SOCIETIES have responded to an initiative of The American Physical Society by co-signing letters to each of the members of the House and Senate budget committees, expressing their concern over the possible consequences of an inadequate investment in research. The letter observes that no amount of spending reduction can succeed in reducing the deficit without the revenues produced by a healthy economy and urges Congress to sustain growth in fundamental research as an essential element of that health. It is unprecedented for so many societies, representing such a broad range of disciplines, to cooperate in this sort of activity. Robert L. Park (202) 429-1946 American Physical Society THAT'S ALL 3/21/86