[net.games.pbm] Crawford Diplomacy Wrap-Up

cad@cbosgd.UUCP (Chuck A DeGaul) (11/26/85)

Well, the Crawford, nee Peak, Diplomacy game has ended in a three-way
draw prior to the Spring 1914 move.  England finished with 15 centers,
Russia 14 and Italy 5.  At one point England had victory in sight, but
was denied the win by a sturdy Italian-Russian alliance of necessity.

I played Russia.  Here is a Russian synopsis of the game.

1901 - I wasn't in the game yet, as I was to take over a floundering
Russian position in the following year.  Turkey opened with moves to
the Black Sea and Armenia, while Russia moved to Rumania.  Austria,
England and France made mostly conventional moves, while Italy put
its Armies into the Piedmont-Venice defensive position.  Only Germany
made a curious move, forsaking any chance at Denmark.  In the Fall,
Russia went into civil disorder, losing Sevastopol to the Turks.  
Germany seized Holland and Belgium, surrendering Denmark to England
who also took Norway.  Italy's move to Piedmont bluffed France back to
cover Marseilles, so Paris only took Portugal.  Serbia and Greece went to
Austria, Tunis to Italy with Bulgaria and Rumania going to Turkey and
the disordered Russia.  England built fleets, Germany and Austria
armies, France and army and Italy a fleet.  Turkey, with the disordered
Russia beckoning, built two fleets!

1902 - I took over Russia's sad position and negotiated desperately
with all neighbors looking for help.  England and Germany advanced
menacingly on me from the north, though Turkey's odd build gave me
a leg to stand on in the south and we agreed to swap Rumania for
Sevastopol.  Austria threatened to join in the Russian carve-up, but

Germany headed east and west hoping to take Warsaw
and threaten Brest.  England saw a chance for a stab and agreed to
turn away from the impending destruction of northern Russia to thrust
a dagger into the over-extended Germans.  I decided to throw my lot
in with the English and went back on my agreement with Turkey to
surrender Rumania.  In the Fall, England took Holland and Sweden,
Austria took Venice with French help, France occupied Spain and
I retained Rumania.  I had the English retreat my northern fleet
so that I could disband it, allowing two builds of much needed armies.
Austria built another army, England one of each, France a fleet.
Germany disbanded an army on Warsaw's door, while Turkey, ever naval-
minded despite my machinations, disbanded an army.

1903 - The full nature of my cooperation with England and my manipulation
of Turkey became clear as I orchestrated a three-power attack on Turkey
while pretending to wish to aid the hapless Ottoman.  England looked
to roll over the split-up German forces and France faced a British
threat in the channel, perhaps guessing her next target.  Austria
moved down the boot of Italy, threatening a relationship I had hoped
to use, and it took all of mine and Italy's skills to talk Austria
into accepting a bigger piece of the Turkish pie instead of the Roman
feast he was preparing.  Had Turkey fallen to me, and Italy to him, a
great naval void would have been open that could only have benefited
the western powers.  I sought to keep one of those healthy.  The end
of the year saw a Russian army in Berlin, with Londons blessings, British
forces in Kiel, French in Belgium and an Austrian unit in Bulgaria.  I built
a fleet in Sevastopol as per my arrangement with England, while France
built a second Mediterranean fleet fueling my fears of a naval vacuum.
Austria and England built armies, while Turkey disposed of her last
army, and German lost all but a Munich garrison.  England stood at 8,
Austria 7, France 6, Russia 6, Italy 3, Turkey 3 and Germany 1.

(Note about England:  Russia had basically put herself in England's
 hands in 1902 and 1903, and the English chose to honor her promises.
 Russia survived because she selected to trust the one other player
 in the game who could be counted on.  Lucky?  Perhaps.  But I was
 able to understand, from the tone, seriousness, and completeness
 of England's negotiations that she was the country to take a chance
 on.  I sought to nurture that trust, expand on it, and live up to it
 myself, until events forced me to break it.  Even then, I delayed to
 the point where it was obvious to all what had to be done, and came
 as no surprise to the British.)

1904 - The year dawned with Russia determined to crush Turkey, preserve
Italy and make sure I wasn't next on England's dinner menu.  I knew I
would have to turn over Berlin to its rightful owners and so concentrated
on seizing at least one Turkish center.  At the critical moment, however,
Austria decided that I was a threat and withheld promised support, grinding
my attack to a halt.  I would lose a piece, and radically alter my strategy.
Meanwhile, France and Austria raced for the last German center, while 
Britain prepared a Parisian stew.  Austria got Munich and built an army.
England took Belgium and Berlin and built one each.  France lost her
over-extended Ruhr army, while I scrapped my Armenian based fleet and
Germany expired.

1905 - The destruction of my fleet sent signals of my intentions to all
capitals.  I was able, however, to calm my English allies and stonewall
the now suspicious Austrians.  Vienna was bombarded with accusations by
me that my offensive against Turkey had been derailed by their treachery,
and that future actions against Turkey would depend on a greater level
of support from Austria.  I hoped that by appearing angry, loud and
demanding, I would make Austria wary, but not convinced I meant them
harm.  To Italy and Turkey, though I talked another tune.  "Little
countries of the world unite", I cried.  We hatched plans for the three
of us to crave up the untrustworthy Austrians (who by now had managed
to anger France over Munich, Italy over Venice, Turkey over Bulgaria
and support of me, and Russia by screwing up my attack on Turkey).
But something went wrong.  Tactical errors robbed us of our initial
chances, as we occupied Bulgaria, then lost it again, with the only
positive result was a Russian army firmly in place in Galacia.  Mostly my
fault, I'm afraid, but it did serve to make our efforts appear bumbling
and fated to fail.  Elsewhere only the occupation of Burgundy by the
British stood out, but as a harbinger of the future it seemed very large.
No one built, except Russia to replace an army destroyed in Bulgaria.

1906 - In many cases, a setback like the one the Turkey/Italy/Russia
axis suffered in 1905 would have shattered the alliance.  Each of us
was facing the possibility of destruction, and the temptation to make
a deal with Austria against our partners was great.  I don't doubt that
Constantinople and Rome were sorely tested in this regard.  However, by
strong negotiating, Russia continued on unbending and 1906 brought a
sudden change.  Russia drove a hard, false, bargain with Austria to again
attempt an attack on Turkey, and although we left the actually final
disposition of Turkish centers to later agreements, we did agree to 
withdraw the threatening army from Galacia.  Austria bit, hook, line
and sinker.  The Spring saw us force our way into Budapest while Italy
reclaimed Venice.  Elsewhere, Britain slipped into Paris and the French
teetered on the brink.  In the Fall,  Turkey stormed Greece, Russia took 
Bulgaria and traded Serbia for Budapest.  As a bonus, a Russian army
slipped into Vienna.  In a shockingly short span of time, Austria crumbled
from 8 units to 2, as England stormed Munich to put the final nails in the
coffin.  The French rebounded with a clever ploy and held Paris, and slipped
into Tunis, probably with Italian permission, to gain a sorely needed build.
Russia built 3 armies and France, England and Turkey each built an army,
all at  Austria's expense.

1907 - The year started with England clearly in the drivers seat with 11
units, but perhaps for the first time sensing that Russia would eventually
threaten as we now had 7 with two more Austria centers to take.  France
had six units but was clearly under pressure.  Turkey had 4 and Italy 3.
The small countries alliance was quickly shattered as Russia moved rapidly
against Turkey.  Italy and Russia divided the remaining Austrian centers
and England began to put strong pressure on France.  Attacking Turkey was
an action that deeply disturbed me.  Turkey, though treacherous early in 
the game, had come to be a staunch partner, and one deserving of better.
But, Russia had begun to feel the pressure of the rapid rise of England
and needed centers badly.  An attack against England was impossible given
the totally demilitarized nature of our mutual borders.  Italy was
promising to act in support of France, which seemed to only way to slow
the British juggernaut.  It was either attack Turkey or stagnate.  Russia
chose the former, though not without a twinge a guilt.  To set up the
attack, Russia honored her agreement with the Turk to turn over Bulgaria.
Meanwhile, Russia armies surrounded Greece and slipped into Armenia.
Ankara fell but Turkey held Bulgaria yielding us no immediate gain, although
Russia used its extra Austrian build to put another fleet into the Black
Sea theater.  Elsewhere, England stormed Paris and put a fleet into the
Mediterranean, blackening the picture in the West.  Turkey seized Tunis
gaining them a needed build, but they chose to build a fleet, hoping, I
suspect, to dissuade us by negotiation.  Perhaps hints of ours tipped
their hand -- and sealed their fate.  France lost a fleet and an
army, Italy built a fleet as did England.

1908 - Two powers crumbled beneath the weight of heavy assaults.
Greece, Bulgaria and Constantinople fell to Russia who cast aside
Turkey's last pleas for a truce.  England stormed Brest and Marseilles
and occupied Tyrolia, raising great fear in the Italian camp, which
was the purpose, no doubt.  At this stage, England and Russia were
still on the best of terms, although cracks were beginning to show.
A treaty negotiated the year before demilitarized even more of formerly
German and Austrian territory, but left a strange and probably deliberate
loop-hole in Tyrolia, through which the British moved.  At year end,
Russia built two armies and a fleet, but continue to honor the ban
on building in St. Petersburg, much to France's dismay.  I very much
wanted to build there, to give England another front to consider, but
felt it would tip England off to my plan.  Score:  England 14, Russia 12,
Italy 4, Turkey 2 and France 2.

1909 - The big break.  Russia sprang her "surprise" on England, marching
on Germany, threatening Scandanavia and finishing off the Turkish home-
land.  Considering how unsurprised England was, Russia would have been
much better off to build in St. Petersburg in 1908, as there was nothing
really to tip off.  England convoyed two armies to the Low Countries in
the Spring and much of the teeth of my attack went away.  Then in the
Fall, Italy and I squabbled over German spoils, and I was forced to take
Berlin instead of getting Italian support for Munich.  This weakened our
future possibilities.  England overran Iberia, but spared a French fleet
she that it could operate against Italy ahead of the main Royal Navy.
That renegade French fleet was to cause more than its share of headaches
and nearly win England the game.  It clearly demonstrated the impact a
one piece force can have on the game.  The year ended with Russians in
Berlin, Italians in Tunis again, and the English in Spain.  I built a
fleet in St. Petersburg on the south coast where it would aid my German
advance.  Italy built a fleet, and England an army.  Turkey was reduced
to nothing and France was reduced to a single fleet operating by the grace
of England.  England and I both stood at 14 units, Italy 5 and France 1.

1910 - In Germany and Scandanavia, a tactical war of attrition ensued.
England brought up overwhelming fleet strength and secured Norway and
Sweden (destroying an army of mine) and began to threaten St. Petersburg.
Russia dug in in Germany and attempted, with little hope, to take Munich.
The focus shifted to the Mediterranean where the French snuck into Rome
as England brought three fleets in to harry the Italians.  To aid the 
Italians, I handed over Greece to them, as they could better use the 
forces at the front while I shifted units out of Turkey.  The year 
ended without builds.  England 14, Russia 13, Italy 5, France 2 (but 
with no home centers).

1911 - England turned up the pressure where it could, in the north.  St.
Petersburg came under attack and fell, although Russia continued to
hold fast in Germany.  France was displaced from Rome, but Russia,
worried about Italy collapsing and giving England the win, secured
Trieste as a bargaining chip and to prevent the loss of a unit.  At
this stage I was contemplating a massive attack on Italy to put me
over the top before England could react, but later analysis should
that this would actually be foolhardy as Italy would turn against me,
giving England the win.  In hindsight, then, taking Trieste at this
stage was bad.  It robbed Italy of some opportunities to push England
back from Tunis.  England built a fleet and an army (replacing an
army destroyed in Tyrolia) giving her 15 to my 13, Italy's 5 and
France's 1.

1912 - My seizing of Trieste came home to haunt me as Italy could not
hold Tunis against the English/French forces.  We were able to destroy
the French fleet, but counting Portugal (which England was now free to
occupy) London stood at 17 units with pressure on Berlin mounting.
Italy and I planned and planned and planned to not make any mistakes.
Still, England slipped a piece into Bohemia and it looked like the
Berlin defense would eventually crumble.  Where England had nearly
settled for a draw the year before, she now refused the offer and
wanted to play the string out.  Italian pressure on Tunis and the
western Mediterranean was intense, and prevented England from
slipping back to grab Portugal, so at the end of the year England
stood at 16, Russia at 13 and Italy at 4, with England still having
Portugal in her pocket.

1913 - The destabilizing English army in Bohemia opened up possibilities
for Russia as well as dangers.  A series of bold moves in the Spring
blew the once static German front wide open.  Suddenly, Russia forces
held Munich and Berlin, and a lone Russian fleet threatened Kiel,
Denmark and Sweden.  England had the Bohemia unit (now surrounded by
Russian armies) an army in Livonia and a fleet in Prussia.  The situation
was unsettling to say the least.  In the Fall, Italy finally guessed a
50-50 attack right and retook Tunis.  Russia held Berlin and Munich and
destroyed the exposed English army in Bohemia.  The Russia Baltic fleet
was likewise blown to bits and the German front looked stable again,
except England's chances to win were severely hampered.  At year end
England held 15 centers, Russia 14 and Italy 5.  After some serious
study of the situation, England apparently decided the the current
position now favored Russia, and agreed to a three-way draw.

In all it was an excellent game.  David Rubin, playing England, was quite
masterful, although he took far to long to crush France and may have
slipped up in 1913 to blow his chance to win.  Larry Bickfurt playing
first Germany, and then later replacing the Italian player, proved
a steady and shrewd player when he had no choices left, but his early
handling of Germany was strategicly flawed.  Several people played
Turkey and I am still at a loss to understand their devotion to naval
strength in the face of land threats.  Several people played France, but 
Tim Schroeder conducted a spirited defense that bought me enough time to
polish off Turkey.  I regret not being able to save him, for his
gallant fight was a shame to waste.  Bob Warren played Austria, and
though he was tactically excellent, his erratic diplomacy eventually
turned all his neighbors against him.

Finally, our two moderators were both superb.  Dave Peak and Matt
Crawford deserve a hearty round of applause from all of us for the
great effort they put into the game.  Dave had to leave the net in
mid-game, but Matt's fine work guided us steadily onward.

Oh yes.  I thought I played a brilliant game strategically, taking a
doomed Russia on to a very strong finish.  Yes, there were several
glaring tactical blunders, but my strategic position was such that
I could afford an occasional slip-up.  I think my propaganda was the
most humorous, too.

Ready for more,

			---> Chuck A DeGaul <---