nelson@dec-quill.UUCP (02/04/86)
I originally posed the following question to this newsgroup: "did Kodak really lose a lawsuit against Polorid for violating Poloroid's patent on its instant cameras?" The answer came back, "YES!" Now there's more. It doesn't really fit into this newsgroup, but since I started it here, I'll post it here. Followups to net.followup or net.legal PLEASE. From _USA Today_, 3-Feb-1986, page B-1, under the column "Moneyline". Reprinted verbatim without permission. -+-+-+-+- -+-+-+-+- CLASS-ACTION SUIT: A Philadelphia woman has filed suit against Eastman Kodak Co., charging deceptive business practices. The suit seeks damages for buyers of instant cameras and film, which Kodak was ordered to stop making because of patent infringement of Poloroid Corp.'s instant cameras. -+-+-+-+- -+-+-+-+- No other information was given. JENelson UUCP: ...!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-quill!nelson Internet: nelson%quill@DEC.decwrl.DEC.COM