[net.sport.baseball] I don't abhor the DH

conrad@ucsfcca.UUCP (Conrad Huang) (05/28/85)

< --------------------------- >

I don't find anything particularly objectionable about the DH rule's effect 
in the day-to-day play of American League baseball games.  As a National 
League partisan I find it a little disorientating to watch an AL game sort 
of instinctively expecting a bottom of the order [read pitcher] to come up 
and all of the side strategies that that involves.  But I'm sure that if I 
watched AL games with regularity that uneasy feeling would go away.

What I *don't* like about the DH rule is its insiduous side effects.  Namely:

 (1) It distorts the career statistics of today's players compared to their 
predecessors.  Could Reggie have broken the 500 HR barrier without the rule? 
How many HR would Mickey Mantle have collected if the DH rule were in effect 
then?  Whenever Reggie passes another name on the all-time HR list I wonder 
if he could have done it without the DH rule.  I would prefer not to have to 
wonder.

 (2) It is detrimental to the careers of American League pitchers.  In the NL,
a good pitcher will often get pulled from a close game in the late innings 
for offensive purposes even though he hasn't tired.  Not so in the AL.  That 
difference alone has caused the careers of AL pitchers in recent years to be 
considerably more lackluster than those of their NL counterparts.  I can 
think of several NL pitchers who are about to turn in Hall of Fame careers
(Carlton, Seaver, Niekro).  They are matched by none in the AL (Stieb and 
Morris are still quite young).  Strictly speaking, this is the fault of
the manager and not the DH rule.  But how can you fault the manager?  His
job is to win with this pitcher now, not five years down the road (unless 
he has job security, rare for a field manager).  NL managers would kill 
their pitchers too, if they had the DH rule.  The massacre that Billy Martin
performed on the 1981 A's pitching staff, ruining five careers would have
been mitigated had their been no DH rule. [At least, there would have been
no *extra-inning* complete games.]

I enjoy baseball by seeing a players season, then career develop as a whole.
If player X goes 2 for 4 in a game, so what?  If player X hits .302 with
27 homers and 115 RBI in a season I find that much more interesting.  This
motivation makes the above objections to the DH rule much more important to
me than it may to you.  They are still valid objections however.

				Go in peace-
					Eric Pettersen