[net.sport.baseball] Yanks fans and antifans

ogre@mhuxl.UUCP (LO COCO) (05/30/85)

> Go Sox! Go Tigers! Go O's! Go Jays! ANYONE but the Yankees. Sorry, guess I'm
> not exactly neutral either.

	Typical fan: You can either root for the Yankees or against them.
	Why not pick a team that wins and jump on the bandwagon.
	Oh well this comes from always being a Yankee fan and I detest
	anyone that roots against a team rather than for a team. 
	As much as I dislike the team that comes from Boston I don't root
	against them, and when they make the World Series, I root for them
	in vain. When the h**l are they going to win one again.

	Here's to a team emerging from the AL East that wins the World
	Series like the last two years in a row. For a while there I
	thought they were leaving it up to the Yankees to do it.
-- 

				John B. Lo Coco
				(...mhuxl!ogre)
				(...szuxn!ogre)
				1-201-467-7436

woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) (06/04/85)

> 	Oh well this comes from always being a Yankee fan and I detest
> 	anyone that roots against a team rather than for a team. 
> 	As much as I dislike the team that comes from Boston I don't root
> 	against them, and when they make the World Series, I root for them

  The major difference between the Yankees (or Cubs, Dodgers, and Braves, for
that matter) is that I'M SICK OF SEEING THEM. They get *way* more coverage
than they deserve, just because they are from New York (or on cable, or from
LA, or on cable, respectively). That does not apply to the Red Sox.

--Greg
-- 
{ucbvax!hplabs | allegra!nbires | decvax!noao | harpo!seismo | ihnp4!noao}
       		        !hao!woods

CSNET: woods@NCAR  ARPA: woods%ncar@CSNET-RELAY
   
     "...I may not be right but I've never been wrong
      It seldom turns out the way it does in the song..."

jeff@utastro.UUCP (Jeff Brown the Scumbag) (06/04/85)

(Break out your fire extinguishers, folks: flame ahead.)

>   The major difference between the Yankees (or Cubs, Dodgers, and Braves, for
> that matter) is that I'M SICK OF SEEING THEM. They get *way* more coverage
> than they deserve, just because they are from New York (or on cable, or from
> LA, or on cable, respectively). 

RIGHT ARM, BROTHER!!!   I am VERY tired of seeing nothing but the New York-
L.A.-Chicago teams on the tube.  One can (and I have!) predicted which games
NBC will show successfully for the first half of the season just by going
through the schedule and picking out the big media center games, plus (just
as an admission of reality) throw in whoever made the playoffs last year.
The only time you go wrong is when the network gets a night game rescheduled
to the afternoon!  I'm convinced that it just about broke their hearts last
year when they had to break down and show Minnesota once or twice because
they were in a pennant race.  I'm perhaps more sensitive than others to this
because I'm actually a Seattle fan (no greater futility exists, except maybe
falling in love with a lesbian) and I see a Mariner in a game on TV exactly
once a year (the token everybody gets in the All-Star game); the last time
the M's were on TV here in Austin was in late August, 1978.  A team which is
not the Yanks/Mets/Dodgers/Angels/Cubs/WhiteSox almost literally has to
get to first place and stay there a month (preferably September!) to be
seen anywhere but on their own networks.

Seriously, I suppose I deserve what I (don't!) get if I'm irrational
enough to root for Seattle.  But there are a total of 26 major league
teams, and it's too bad you only ever see ten or so of them.

Jeff Brown the Scumbag
Astronomy Dept., U of Texas
{allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!jeff