[net.sport.baseball] "Quality" Starts

rokhsar@lasspvax.UUCP (Dan Rokhsar) (09/18/85)

In a local newspaper (The Staten Island Advance) I found an interesting article
describing an alternative measure of pitching prowess for starting pitchers,
attributed to John Lowe of the Philadelphia Inquirer.  The stat simply counts 
the number of times a starter pitches 6 or more innings and allows three or
fewer runs.  Here are the leaders, thru games of Friday September 13:

Teams(NL)				ERA, ERA rank
New York	94 of 140	67%	3.18 (3)	
Padres		86			3.40 (5)
Cardinals	85			3.11 (2)
Astros		83			3.70 (9)
Phillies	81			3.45 (6)
Dodgers		81			2.93 (1)
Reds		80			3.69 (8)
Expos		79			3.30 (4)
Giants		74			3.49 (7)
Pirates		74			3.89 (10)
Cubs		69			4.01 (11)
Braves		58		42%	4.12 (12)


Individual(NL) before Friday
Gooden		29 of 31	94%	one of the nonquality starts was the
					2 2/3 innings he pitched at the
					beginning of the marathon 19 inning 
					game, when he was pulled due to a pair
					of long rain delays; the other was the 
					5 run outing on 15 August
Tudor		24
Dravecky	23
Bryn Smith	22
Danny Cox	22
Valenzuela	22
Darling		21
Nolan Ryan	20
Joe Niekro	20
Hershiser	20
Andujar		20 of 33	61%	in his last ten outings, he is 3-4 with 					a 5.81 ERA
Browning	20
Knepper		20
Reuschel	20 of 22	91%
Show		20
Hawkins		20

Leading the AL is Dave Stieb with 25
Kansas City leads the league
Guidry is ninth with 19 of 29 for 66%
Ed Whitson is 5-0 in his last 9 starts; none were Quality Starts, but the
(once powerful) Yankees scored more than 7 runs in each game!

Sorry about the spotty AL stats, but thats all there was in the paper.

How about an analogous Quality Relief Performance to augment (or supplant)
"Saves"; it would be (1) 3 or more innings with 1 or fewer runs allowed, or
(2) less than 3 innings with no runs allowed.  I don't have the numbers, but
if anyone has the necessary data base...


Just thought this would interest you bums
		Dan Rokhsar

At the risk of seeming chauvinistic, how about Tony Pena (overstrike xxxxxxxxx)
oops, I mean Gary Carter, for Most Valuable Player - not just his run 
production but (and I know some will laugh) his playing hurt, helping to 
fire up the team, helping the (still) young pitching staff, etc.  Considering
the fabulous pitching job done by LA, replacing Guerrero by a player of lesser
talent would probably not have dislodged the Dodgers from first, but theres
no way the Mets could have done it (I'm planning ahead, of course!) without
G.C.  

Some of my friends have suggested that John Tudor will be the 1985 Cy Young 
winner in the NL, since the award is clearly meant to be given to MORTALS,
not supernatural beings! (I would put a smiley face here except I hate the
way it looks)