[net.sport.baseball] The \"minor league\"

cherson@nonode.DEC (10/25/85)

Even though this world series has not captured my attention much, I would like
to comment on the disparaging remarks made re: the American League being a
"minor league".  

If there is anything I hate more it is those NL purists who are drugging 
themselves into thinking that we are in the days of Roberto Clemente and
Willie Mays.  Wake up!  The quality of the play in the NL is not any better
than that in the AL.  I watch both leagues and I can testify to the fact that
the only difference between the leagues is the DH.  NL chauvinists wouldn't
know this because most absolutely refuse to watch an AL game, so they're not
aware of the quality of play.

Speaking of the DH, this is the reason why it is so tough to be a pitcher in
the AL.  Starting pitchers have to have more stamina and endurance than their
counterparts in the NL, they're often on the mound longer.  Yes, the DH takes
away some strategy, but not all.  I'm not particularly fond of the DH and
would like to see it abolished (isn't Uberroth doing this?).

Don't based the two leagues on the annual summer EXHIBITION game.  This game
has no meaning whatsoever.  The real test is something like the series, where
it is team vs. team, not a millionaire's pick-up game.  That is why I'm in 
favor of interleague play.

The AL fell behind during the '50's because they integrated at a slower pace
than the NL.  But the times have changed and there are as many exciting
players in the AL as in the NL.  By the way where did John Tudor come from?

D.C.