boxer@wjh12.UUCP (vasilatos) (01/27/84)
I ran more of Teus Hagan's compute and disk benchmarks from San Diego on assorted boxes at the /Vendor/Group Circus in D.C. last week. Times (per the table he published last year), are given below. I was unfortunately less than rigorous about noting particulars of cpu model and operating frequency in each case. I think they are more or less uniquely determined by system model. Neither did I look in their cabinets to see what sort of disk drives had been installed for the show. Nick Vasilatos (wjh12!boxer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- usr usr usr usr usr usr real real real short reg-sh int reg-int long reg-lng cc#1 cc#2 run#2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel 380/286 (80286) (0) 16.3 10.7 16.4 10.7 38.7 38.8 16.0 16.0 4.0 TI Nu (68010) 14.9 8.0 18.8 7.8 18.8 7.8 15.0 15.0 5.0 HP 9000/500 (HP/prop.) 9.7 9.7 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 9.7 11.3 2.1 Spectrix 10 (68010) (1) 13.2 8.3 14.9 8.1 14.9 8.1 18.0 18.0 10.0 Gould 1000 (80186) (2) 27.9 18.3 27.6 18.4 na na 18.0 19.0 14.0 Gould 2000 (68010) (3) 13.3 8.8 13.9 7.1 13.8 7.1 15.9 15.4 32.5 NS SYS16 (16000) (4) 25.4 25.4 30.4 12.5 30.5 12.4 12.0 14.0 6.0 __________________________________________________ (0) Not at the show, found laying about elsewhere. The cpu is an 8 mhz 286. (1) I think the cpu on the Spectrix 10 is a 68010. I thought their glossy identified it, but it doesn't. (2) Time reporting on this system has definite problems. Na times above were wildly out of range of real (observed/reported) times for the tests. (3) The time for the disk benchmark is very suspicious. If it is right, the disk is either the slowest in the east or the os is most brain damaged in the west. (4) Again the glossy doesn't identify the specific cpu. There was other activity on the system (slight), about which there was nothing I could do.