[net.unix] none

Byard%dca-ems@sri-unix.UUCP (10/26/83)

Date: October 26, 1983
Re:   EUUG?
Text: I don't know, but I'm also interested.
Larry Byard
Stuttgart

jdb%s1-c@sri-unix.UUCP (12/16/83)

Please remove me (jdb@s1-c) from the INFO-UNIX mailing list.  Thanks.

MCB%mit-mc@sri-unix.UUCP (01/09/84)

From:  Michael A. Bloom <MCB@mit-mc>


The termcap entry for the adm42 specifies 270 ms padding for insert-line
and none for delete line.  This seems kind of odd (it also produces
a quick upward motion with a slow corresponding downward motion)

Has anyone modified this entry for their own use?  It looks like
someone just forced in a 'worst-case' value.  Is there any reason
not to use a smaller pad value with * to multiply it by the number of affected
lines?

	Thanks,
	Michael Bloom (mcb@mit-mc)
		      ( v.sdcrdcf!randvax!ttidca!mab@ucla-net )  arpa
		      ( ..!ucla-vax!sdcrdcf!randvax!ttidca!mab ) uucp

cpr%su-shasta@imagen.UUCP (01/27/84)

If you want hairy DECtape stories, ask the old-time PDP-10'ers.
Harvard ran their KA-10 for years with just a 256K Burroughs swapping
drum, and DECtapes for all program and data access.  It wasn't as bad
as it sounds; they were still doing it as late as 1973 (oops, that makes
me an old-timer).

--Chris Ryland, IMAGEN

gwyn%brl-vld@sri-unix.UUCP (02/05/84)

From:      Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn@brl-vld>

Here is a brief review of "The UNIX Programming Environment" by Brian
W. Kernighan & Rob Pike (1984, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 0-13-937681-X {PBK}).
(The authors work at Bell Labs and are well known to the UNIX community.)

This is the best book I have ever seen for UNIX programmers.  The
first few chapters can be read profitably by any intelligent first-time
UNIX user, but the book overall is targeted for professional programmers
who are encountering UNIX for the first time.  I must say that many old-
timers could learn something from this book, too.

The chapter titles are:
	UNIX for Beginners
	The File System
	Using the Shell
	Filters
	Shell Programming
	Programming with Standard I/O
	UNIX System Calls
	Program Development
	Document Preparation
	Epilog
with appendices
	Editor summary
	"hoc" Manual
	"hoc" Listing

"hoc" is an interpreter for a programmable calculator language, used as
a real-world example of program development.

This book is not just a description of features available on UNIX;
instead, the authors explain what is going on and why.  Anyone familiar
with "Software Tools" will recognize the approach.

Roughly half the book emphasizes the use of existing tools in shell
programs.  This is as it should be; it is perhaps the single greatest
contribution of UNIX to program development.

It is remarkable how little dependency on the particular version of
UNIX there is.  The few variations that matter are dealt with as needed.

I would recommend this book as THE book for all UNIX programmers.

warner%clemson.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA (07/05/84)

From:      Daniel Warner <warner%clemson.csnet@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA>

Please add WARNER@CLEMSON to the INFO-UNIX special interest group.
Clemson is on CSNET.  Thanks.
Dan Warner

sde@MITRE-BEDFORD.ARPA (08/09/84)

Re S1 OS:
There is an article on it in Comp. Design, 1984 July, and another article
that makes reference to S1 in a comparison table.
   David   sde@mitre-bedford

bblue@NOSC.ARPA (09/22/84)

I was looking through my uucp log the other day and noticed a syntax I've
never seen used before (or since).  I can't find any reference to it or
what it might mean in any documentation I have.

In the THEM/ME fields, what would normally appear:

	THEM (S D.xxxxx X.xxxxx .... etc.

In this occurrence, I got:

	THEM (S D.xxxxx X.xxxxx   **NSC**)

When that particular piece of mail and its header were done, I would usually
get this in the logfile:

	daemon XQT (PATH= .... etc.

However in this occurrence:

	**NSC** XQT (PATH= ....

The mail was posted correctly, and no other peculiarities were noticed.
Now, uucp wizards, WHAT does **NSC** mean?

--Bill Blue	{ihnp4, sdcsvax!bang}!crash!bblue
		bang!crash!bblue@nosc