[net.unix] UNIX vs. VMS speed

glenm@mako.UUCP (01/03/85)

For a typical mix of shell/edit/compile jobs on an 11/780, does
anyone know how UNIX compares with VMS in terms of performance?
By performance is meant response time and throughput time.

I realize that this is an involved question, and that there are
lots of other arguments in favor of UNIX.  This is being done for
a friend whose site is stuck with VMS.

I would also like to know, if one OS is significantly better than
the other, what the reasons are.  Thanks.

				Glen McCluskey
				..tektronix!mako!glenm

"Gary S. Moss (AMXBR-VLD-V)" <moss@Brl-Vld.ARPA> (01/04/85)

Boy, whenever the VMS vs. UNIX battle finally quiets down,
someone has to stir things up again, let's try to be civil this
time, after all, we all know you either prefer UNIX for the obvious
reasons, or you defend VMS to justify your current predicament.

;-) Moss.

rcb@rti-sel.UUCP (Randy Buckland) (01/04/85)

> 
> I realize that this is an involved question, and that there are
> lots of other arguments in favor of UNIX.  This is being done for
> a friend whose site is stuck with VMS.
> 

	Then this question is not going to help your friend. I don't have
any exact figures, but from just general experience on a 750 running 
BSD 4.2 and a 750 running VMS, the VMS machine is significantly faster.
I would guess that it is about 1.4 to 1.8 times faster in general execution
speed. This is probably attributable to the faster file system and I/O system.

					Randy Buckland
					Research Triangle Institute
					...!mcnc!rti-sel!rcb

liberte@uiucdcs.UUCP (01/08/85)

How about someone (or a group) take on the task of preparing the definitive
document comparing UNIX and VMS.  Collect all the arguments made so far
and make the best cases for both sides.  Then let's figure out a way to
keep it around (like in net.announce.newusers) and update it periodically.

Daniel LaLiberte          (ihnp4!uiucdcs!liberte)
U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Computer Science
{moderation in all things - including moderation}

dave@fluke.UUCP (Dave Van Ess) (01/10/85)

> How about someone (or a group) take on the task of preparing the definitive
> document comparing UNIX and VMS.  Collect all the arguments made so far
> and make the best cases for both sides.  Then let's figure out a way to
> keep it around (like in net.announce.newusers) and update it periodically.
> 
> Daniel LaLiberte          (ihnp4!uiucdcs!liberte)
> U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Computer Science
> {moderation in all things - including moderation}

Trying to compare UNIX and VMS is like comparing apples and lemons.

					Dave Van Ess
					John Fluke Mfg Co
					Everett WA

rabson@harvard.ARPA (David Rabson) (01/16/85)

> > How about someone (or a group) take on the task of preparing the definitive
> > document comparing UNIX and VMS.  Collect all the arguments made so far
> > and make the best cases for both sides.  Then let's figure out a way to
> > keep it around (like in net.announce.newusers) and update it periodically.
> > 
> > Daniel LaLiberte          (ihnp4!uiucdcs!liberte)
> > U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Computer Science
> > {moderation in all things - including moderation}
> 
> Trying to compare UNIX and VMS is like comparing apples and lemons.
> 
> 					Dave Van Ess
> 					John Fluke Mfg Co
> 					Everett WA

Guess which one's the lemon.



					David Rabson
					Harvard University

"SYS$_OOBAST" sounds like something one says after some very good
ice cream, or else a swear word to be used against intransigent machines.