marc@aplvax.UUCP (Marcus H. Gates) (06/18/85)
Investigating our SLOW 4.2 system and grasping at straws led me to discover a discrepancy between the documented default value for fs_rotdelay and the actual default value used when creating a filesystem. fs(5) says that the default is 2ms while looking at mkfs.c shows that the value used is 4ms (this fact was also verified using dumpfs). Is 2ms better than 4??? Our disks are SI9766's emulating rm05's. Any help in correctly tuning our filesystems is appreciated. -- marc gates umcp-cs!aplvax!marc