[net.suicide] why

daly@nybcb.UUCP (daly) (01/20/84)

why does net.suicide exist?

jsq@ut-sally.UUCP (John Quarterman) (01/22/84)

Jump!  Jump!
-- 
John Quarterman, CS Dept., University of Texas, Austin, Texas
jsq@ut-sally.ARPA, jsq@ut-sally.UUCP, {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!jsq

lied@ihlts.UUCP (01/23/84)

I have been informed that net.suicide was not a response
to a motorcycle lover, but the result of an unoriginal joke
told over dinner by Rob Pike to John Linderman.
I stand corrected (orthopedic shoes, doncha know).

Still the question remains:  who was bimmler?

	42!  No, doesn't fit...
		Bob Lied	ihnp4!ihlts!lied

rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (01/24/84)

In answer to the question "Why?":

The determinist says: "Because."
The advocate of free will says:  "Why not?"
And the chicken says:  "To get to the other side."

Summing it all up...  (that's my job)
-- 
Pardon me for breathing...
	Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr

suhre@trw-unix.UUCP (01/24/84)

I don't know why, but I started reading it because of
a recommendation from another reader.  It was alleged
that the quality of insults had been truly marvelous.
Someone had suggested that someone else put their finger
in the light socket and their foot in the toilet bowl.
Now that's real imagination!!!!!

However, Murphy's Law prevailed (as it always does) and
the activity and number of insults decayed exponentially
shortly after I started reading.

I have no intention of killing myself intentionally, and
I may end up doing it inadvertently via some combination
of too much sodium and high blood pressure.....

					Maurice

lied@ihlts.UUCP (Bob Lied) (01/28/84)

Ah, why.  That omni-present question.  We could be metaphysical and
say it simply does.  We could be empirical and classify its characteristics,
attempting to fit them into the structure of scientific knowledge.
Or we could simply disregard the question and discuss wombats instead.

Actually, this group does occasionally contain discussions of the
pros and cons of suicide.  Those taking the pro side don't seem
to sustain their arguments very well.

Last summer, this group was a veritable Normandy in a war of good and
evil that spanned the net from net.religion to net.flame.  Perhaps
some of the brave warriors will fill us in on what the hell that was
all about, anyway.

As for history, net lore has it that this group was created facetiously
when someone suggested a group to discuss motorcycles.  Another case
of serendipity bringing us better living through technology.  Or in this
case, better dying.

		Bob Lied	ihnp4!ihlts!lied

hutch@shark.UUCP (Stephen Hutchison) (01/30/84)

The net.suicide I knew got started as a result of someone flaming
that there should be such a group for people who ride motorcycles
without helmets.  There may have been later things going on that
actually led to its real creation.

Bimmler was the login account, if one can believe the tortuous
chain of deception and insult, of one Elizabeth Bimmler, who
went on vacation for a month or two and failed to make her login
secure from worms.  Needless to say, a worm decided to use her
account to launch venomous and truly unwarranted attacks on any
number of people.  The account was on "rabbit" and maybe jj will
tell us what happened there, but probably not.

Well, every time I post to this group, someone suggests that I
should go off and self-immolate, so I will forestall them by
pouring gasoline on my terminal and . .  . kldjsagf sgk