sanand (02/22/83)
This posting is to make clear some points made about our product "UNITY under VMS", by the article "Info on UNITY and .." by ...sask!custead recieved Feb 21 1983. *This is not intended to be a sales blurb.* 1. Our sales people (should) never have said full 4.1 compatible. We are Bell UNIX compatible, even if we don't supply "finger". We *apologize* for any misunderstanding, perhaps our sales person was talking about the National Semiconductor 16032 version of UNITY, which at the moment is based on 4.1BSD. 2. We *will* be running (and supporting) uucp in the coming months. ....decvax!hcr!sanand [For HCR]