jfk@tulane.UUCP (John Kreuter) (10/10/85)
In article <57700001@hpcnof.UUCP> dat@hpcnof.UUCP writes: > >/***** hpcnof:net.sources / birtch!oleg / 6:19 pm Sep 25, 1985*/ >> I have found that vt52 terminals on our Pyramid 90x ( 4.2 & V5, in >> 4.2 BSD univerce) work just fine. vt100 on the other hand did not. >> I traced the problem to TERMCAP : vt100 entry contains the length of >> character sequence in front of "cm", "cl" and some other sequences. >> That I fixed by setting environment var TERMCAP to be the modifyed >> vt100 entry from /etc/termcap ( without sequence length : "cm=\E[..." >> instead of "cm=5\E[...") At Tulane we have been using vt100's and vt220's on the Pyramid, using the termcap entry as supplied by Pyramid. We have not experienced any problems. Are other Pyramid users experiencing problems with these terminals? Are there modifications that have optimized the performance of the vt's? John Kreuter Tulane University New Orleans, La. ihnp4!ulysses!tulane!jfk