[net.sources] REQUEST for IMMEDIATE moderation/censorship of net.sources

werner@ut-ngp.UUCP (Werner Uhrig) (12/16/85)

the recent flood of this group with meta-discussion, flames, insults,
and other inappropriate garble (anything but sources), partially caused
by the lacking feature of the posting-software to prevent follow-ups to
net.sources, leads me to request this.  Having to wade through several
hundred articles is a good enough argument for me.

Note that this is NOT censorship as such, as I don't mind all the bozo
back-and-forth discussion/insult-fest in group net.news.group, which I
have long since unsubscribed.  If someone cares to start a moderated
group for that topic, I might consider finding time for it - not that
anyone should care, really, if I try to contribute my thoughts on
related topics, or not ....

	I don't mind using the N-key a few times, but hundreds of times ????

		Growl,		---Werner

wcs@ho95e.UUCP (Bill.Stewart.4K435.x0705) (12/18/85)

In article <2722@ut-ngp.UUCP> werner@ut-ngp.UUCP (Werner Uhrig) writes:
>the recent flood of this group with meta-discussion, flames, insults,
>and other inappropriate garble (anything but sources), partially caused
>by the lacking feature of the posting-software to prevent follow-ups to
>net.sources, leads me to request this.  Having to wade through several
>hundred articles is a good enough argument for me.
So read mod.sources if you don't like net.sources.  Followups in
net.sources are a desirable feature - unless everyone starts posting
bug-free-portable-everywhere-so-terrific-you-wouldn't-ask-questions
software, followups are needed.  I agree there is too much random
discussion here (viz. this article), but there was an attempt a while
back to separate net.sources and net.sources.wanted.  It failed, but
mod.sources developed.  If you used "rn", you could look at a list of
article titles, and you could automatically kill off discussions that
you thought were boring.
-- 
# Bill Stewart, AT&T Bell Labs 2G-202, Holmdel NJ 1-201-949-0705 ihnp4!ho95c!wcs

perl@rdin.UUCP (Robert Perlberg) (12/18/85)

There already IS a moderated sources group -- mod.sources.  If
you don't like what's going on in net.sources, read mod.sources
instead.

Robert Perlberg
Resource Dynamics Inc.
New York
{philabs|delftcc}!rdin!perl