[net.tv] censored movies on cable

garyh@iddic.UUCP (05/08/84)

<<<>>>
  The question of 'censored' movies on cable is not as easy as it may at first
seem. As far as I have ever heard, the pay tv companies claim that they show
exactly what they are given by the movie companies, without cuts. The problem
comes in what the movie company gives them. The companies may release several
slightly different versions to different audiences; ie. domestic first run,
domestic second run, overseas, home video, cable, and network tv.  The reasons
for this are many; the director may change his mind (particularly between first
and second run, ie. Kubrick, and Spielbergs 'special editon' of Close
Encounters); there may be more/less sex/violence, ie. network tv, 'European'
versions, home video; and running time considerations, seen in (of course) tv
networks, home video, and (maybe) cable. Runtime is a two way street; making
a film shorter can include cuts and alsotime compression to fit into a
limited time slot. On the other hand, sometimes films are lengthened, a
practice sometimes used on networks to try to build audiences (Superman 1
springs readily to mind; 15 new minutes from the cutting room floor to ABC.)
Dressed to Kill on cassette had some gratuitous sex added, Blade Runner had
some extra violence on cassette. I have'nt seen either of these on cable, so I
don't know which version they used. Also consider Star Trek 1, which had scenes
added for its network tv showing; as it turns out, these scenes helped the
plot considerably, and the videocassete was reissued including the new
material. So, you see, it isn't quite so simple as nasty hbo/showtime/movie
channel/... viciously hacking up the movies for their own perverse reasons.
Maybe they do, I don't know. I (for one) would like to hear about such changes,
for no other reason than mere curiousity. (Have you ever heard about all the
different versions of their songs the Beatles released?  But that's another
subject entirely.)
 
   On another issue, did you notice a few weeks ago that (abc,cbs, whatever)
was more than a little dissapointed by the ratings for the network showing of
Star Wars?  They were finally hit over the head by the fact that they simply
can't compete with cable and home video; anybody with access to these sources
has had plenty of opportunity to get bored to tears with the film.  They have
now officially redirected their efforts towards mini-series and tv movies,
ironically, exactly what the pay tv services are trying to do to differentiate
themselves one from another.
 
 
  Gary Hanson     Tektronix IDG